[Skip to Content]
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
November 1985

Repair of Growing VesselsContinuous Absorbable or Interrupted Nonabsorbable Suture?

Author Affiliations

From the Department of Surgery, State University of New York, Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn.

Arch Surg. 1985;120(11):1281-1283. doi:10.1001/archsurg.1985.01390350063013
Abstract

• Twenty 1-month-old piglets were subjected to aortic transection and primary repair either with a posterior-running, anterior-interrupted nonabsorbable suture (group 1) or a circumferential continuous absorbable suture (group 2) technique. Mean piglet weight increased by 886% at six months and 1,184% at nine months. Aortic cross-sectional areas increased by 243% and 340%, respectively. Grossly visible, though minimal, stricture formation was noted in three pigs from group 1 and was associated with an overall 5.8% average anastomotic stricture at six months and 3.5% at nine months in group 1, compared with 0.2% and −0.1%, respectively, in group 2. Adhesion formation, fibrosis, and foreign-body reaction were common in group 1 but negligible in group 2. This corresponded to a mean wall thickness measured at nine months of 2.0±0.9 mm in group 1 and of 1.0±0.4 mm in group 2.

(Arch Surg 1985;120:1281-1283)

×