[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.204.247.205. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
August 1988

Breast Cancer Diagnosis

Arch Surg. 1988;123(8):1024. doi:10.1001/archsurg.1988.01400320110026
Abstract

To the Editor.—The complexities of diagnosing small breast cancers plague all of us. A single diagnostic technique, fine-needle aspiration (FNA), was described by Adye et al1 in the January issue of the Archives. I express reservations about their study of this technique.

1. Size of the mass. Is FNA really appropriate for lesions that have no mammographic density and are only a cluster of calcifications?

The authors stated that the operator "stabilizes the mass," but this is impossible for many occult lesions. The authors also describe the smallest lesion detected in their study as being 1×0.8×0.6 cm, which would exclude many of the tiny lesions we are desirous of detecting and diagnosing. It would be helpful to know how many patients had their conditions diagnosed by other techniques, ie, how the practical selection of the 137 patients in the study was accomplished.

The authors excluded "a few patients"

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×