[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.145.232.99. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
August 1989

Plasma Polymerized Tetrafluoroethylene/Polyethylene Terephthalate Vascular Prostheses

Author Affiliations

From the Department of Surgery, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, Ill (Dr Greisler, Dennis, Schwarcz, and Klosak and Ms Ellinger); and Department of Pathology, St Barnabas Medical Center, Livingston, NJ (Dr Kim).

Arch Surg. 1989;124(8):967-972. doi:10.1001/archsurg.1989.01410080103017
Abstract

• Tetrafluoroethylene (TFE) was discharged onto woven polyethylene terephthalate (PET) prostheses, and the PET prostheses (50 mm long) with or without TFE were implanted into canine carotid arteries and aortas. Additional controls included polytetrafluoroethylene and Dacron. Specimens were explanted after one to 12 months, photographed, and sectioned for light and scanning and transmission electron microscopy, and thrombus-free surface areas calculated by computerized planimetry. Results showed no significant patency differences among carotid or aortic groups. However, both PET carotid groups had significantly greater thrombusfree surface areas. Histologically, both PET groups appeared identical. An endothelialized neointima covered PET carotid specimens by six months, compared with three months in the aortic position, with greater pannus ingrowth in both PET groups. Plasma polymerized TFE offered no additional advantage in these long-term experiments.

(Arch Surg 1989;124:967-972)

×