[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.205.153.63. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
October 1989

The Misconception of Trauma Reimbursement

Author Affiliations

From the Department of Surgery, St Louis University Medical Center, Mo.

Arch Surg. 1989;124(10):1237-1240. doi:10.1001/archsurg.1989.01410100143025
Abstract

• As health care costs increase, hospital reimbursement from trauma victims is decreasing. Thus, the number of institutions dedicated to trauma care continues to decrease in this country. Two hundred eight consecutive patients admitted to a level 1 trauma center were evaluated during a 10-month period. The total bill for 207 patients was $4 044 156, averaging $19 537 per patient. Total reimbursement 6 months after billing was $2 054 090, 51% of the total bill. Methods to improve reimbursement include increasing the ratio of blunt to penetrating trauma victims and by assembling a team knowledgeable in reimbursement options. However, because a major portion of trauma reimbursement comes under federal government regulation, topics such as diagnostic related groups and other classification criteria of critically injured patients need to be reevaluated, or underpayment for trauma patients will continue to be a national plague.

(Arch Surg. 1989;124:1237-1240)

×