Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
August 1992

Safety of Surgical Procedures

Author Affiliations

Lucknow, India

Arch Surg. 1992;127(8):993. doi:10.1001/archsurg.1992.01420080127023

To the Editor.—We read the article by Shaked et al1 in the May 1991 issue of the Archives with interest. We would like to share our opinion, and convey a few suggestions. Yes, we too believe that surgery performed by residents under "painstaking supervision" and guidance of a consultant who is aware of his or her resident's capabilities and drawbacks, is safe. The constraint in such a study is judging whether it is really possible to obtain "true consent" from a patient who would, obviously, like to get operated on by a consultant. Second, the need for intraoperative assistance or to have a consultant take over the case for tackling an unusual anatomical/pathological difficulty will make correct interpretation of such a study difficult. Practice being an inseparable part of training, the training would suffer unless the surgeon-in-making gets to perform surgery. Hence, a variable is required that

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview