[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.161.168.21. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
March 1993

Restoration, Not Preservation, of General Surgery Residency

Author Affiliations

From the Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass, and the Surgical Services, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.

Arch Surg. 1993;128(3):265-268. doi:10.1001/archsurg.1993.01420150019003
Abstract

Is there a problem with surgical training? What is broken and what needs fixing? In considering these questions, I should state at the outset that my thoughts, while shaped by deliberations and debates within the American Board of Surgery (ABS), do not state the position of the Board, which has yet to formulate its position. My concern is that although we are successful in providing excellent general surgical training, we may need a new mechanism for providing further special training to general surgeons.

Certification in surgery requires a broad training in the basic science of surgery and documented experience and skill in the nine primary components of surgery, as defined by the ABS. It also demands significant exposure to the four secondary components and an understanding of the management of common problems in other areas related to surgery (Table 1). The breadth and scope of the educational task is formidable

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×