[Skip to Content]
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
October 1994

Residency EvaluationsAre They Worth the Effort?

Author Affiliations

From the Department of Surgery, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, Ill.

Arch Surg. 1994;129(10):1067-1073. doi:10.1001/archsurg.1994.01420340081015
Abstract

Objective:  The accuracy of rotation evaluation forms was assessed to determine the usefulness of clinical performance ratings in predicting competence in a general surgery residency.

Design:  Longitudinal, 15-year, multifactorial, repeated-measures design.

Setting:  University medical center residency training program.

Participants:  General surgery and subspecialty residents (n=310) entering postgraduate training from 1976 to 1990 received 6459 rotation evaluations. Predictive efficiency of 4423 evaluations of a subsample of 199 residents admitted to the general surgery program during the study period was assessed using several outcome measures.

Main Outcome Measure:  Attending surgeons categorized and ranked residents' competence at the completion of training.

Results:  Rotation evaluations identified 77.8% of residents who involuntarily withdrew. Prediction of outcome category (problem, average, or superior residents), as well as final ranking (R2=.54), were demonstrated (P<.001). Evaluations of residents from the first year of training onward predicted outcome at the end of training (P<.01).

Conclusion:  Rotation evaluations demonstrate predictive validity in documenting resident performance, particularly when the accuracy of individual raters is known.(Arch Surg. 1994;129:1067-1073)

×