June 1995

Invited Commentary

Author Affiliations

Brisbane, Australia

Arch Surg. 1995;130(6):577. doi:10.1001/archsurg.1995.01430060015002

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.


As we move toward the end of the 20th century, the approach to many common surgical procedures is in a state of flux. With the introduction and rapid uptake of laparoscopic cholecystectomy around the world, there has been great enthusiasm toward extending these techniques into all aspects of general surgery. One of the first and obvious choices was inguinal hernia repair, which, apart from being a very common procedure, has a wide impact on the workforce. It was hoped that the laparoscopic approach would allow an early return to work, thereby saving the individual patient and the community large sums of money.

There has, however, been controversy, perhaps in hernia repair more so than in any other laparoscopic procedure. As Rutkow so elegantly describes in his article, the possible benefits of an early return to work with laparoscopic hernia surgery have been offset occasionally by very serious complications. The worst

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview