[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.205.173.230. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
April 1996

TelesurgeryAcceptability of Compressed Video for Remote Surgical Proctoring

Author Affiliations

From the Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Research Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, Calif (Drs Hiatt, Shabot, and Phillips); Department of Surgery, UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles (Drs Hiatt and Shabot); and RECOM Technologies Inc (Dr Haines) and Computational Sciences Division (Mr Grant), Ames Research Center, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Moffett Field, Calif.

Arch Surg. 1996;131(4):396-400. doi:10.1001/archsurg.1996.01430160054009
Abstract

Objective:  To determine the clinical acceptability of various levels of video compression for remote proctoring of laparoscopic surgical procedures.

Design:  Observational, controlled study.

Setting:  Community-based teaching hospital.

Participants:  Physician and nurse observers.

Interventions:  Controlled surgical video scenes were subjected to various levels of data compression for digital transmission and display and shown to participant observers.

Main Outcome Measures:  Clinical acceptability of video scenes after application of video compression.

Results:  Clinically acceptable video compression was achieved with a 1.25-megabit/second data rate, with the use of odd-screen 43.3:1 Joint Photographic Expert Group compression and a small screen for remote viewing.

Conclusion:  With proper video compression, remote proctoring of laparoscopic procedures may be performed with standard 1.5-megabit/second telecommunication data lines and services.(Arch Surg. 1996;131:396-400)

×