[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.204.108.121. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
March 1997

Invited Commentary

Author Affiliations

Royal Adelaide Hospital Adelaide, Australia

Arch Surg. 1997;132(3):240. doi:10.1001/archsurg.1997.01430270026003

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

Achalasia is an uncommon problem, with an incidence of 1 per 100 000 persons. This means that many medical centers will not have experience in treating the condition, as is the situation with the group reporting in this article. The 14.5% incidence of perforation might seem high, and the 39% alleviation of dysphagia low, but the results probably reflect the situation as it exists away from large and specialized referral centers; I think the authors are to be commended on providing such data.

Eight patients who sustained a perforation seemed to have less advanced achalasia than the patients who did not have a perforation. This is an interesting finding, and the authors reasonably advocate caution in treating patients with early achalasia by bag dilatation. The surgical results achieved were excellent because there were few primary myotomies and most surgical procedures were performed for short- or long-term failure of bag dilatation.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×