[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.197.65.227. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
August 1997

Invited Commentary

Author Affiliations

Denver Health Medical Center Denver, Colo

Arch Surg. 1997;132(8):913. doi:10.1001/archsurg.1997.01430320115019

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

Diagnostic peritoneal lavage revolutionized the management of patients with blunt abdominal trauma and abdominal stab wounds. Missed injuries and unnecessary laparotomies have become rare. Surgeons have often presumed that all gunshot wounds that penetrate the peritoneal cavity require laparotomy; while not absolutely correct, it is not a bad policy. The difficulty has been to determine whether a bullet has penetrated the peritoneum. This is particularly true for posterior and flank gunshot wounds, where the bullet does not exit, and for through-and-through gunshot wounds that seem to be tangent to the peritoneum. Clinical judgment has been reasonably accurate in identifying patients at risk; radiopaque markers at the entrance and exit sites with anterior or posterior and lateral x-ray films will aid in estimating the trajectory of the missile. Nevertheless, bullets, particularly the low-velocity variety, can be deflected by skin or fascia and actually travel in a curved path, skirting around the

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×