[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.204.247.205. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
September 1997

Invited Commentary

Author Affiliations

University of Kentucky Medical Center Lexington, Ky

Arch Surg. 1997;132(9):990. doi:10.1001/archsurg.1997.01430330056008

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

This article is an interesting analysis of some growth rates in the field of surgery. The admittedly soft data for both 1983 and 1994 demonstrate a phenomenal increase in some operations and a general increase in all operations of 29%. At the same time, the number of surgeons increased 17.9%. Concentrating on Table 10, I would choose to emphasize some points not made by the author. The annual workload for the 2 surveyed years has been similar for 3 specialties: 71 (1983) and 78 (1994) for general surgeons, 119 (1983) and 99 (1994) for neurosurgeons, and 108 (1983) and 119 (1994) for urologists. Gynecologic surgeons, as indicated in the article, have experienced a decrease in the number of operations performed, perhaps not surprising as birth rates decline.

This leaves 4 specialties for analysis. As pointed out in the article, the sizable increase in the number of operations performed by otorhinolaryngologists

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×