[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.163.92.62. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
Sign In
Individual Sign In
Create an Account
Institutional Sign In
OpenAthens Shibboleth
[Skip to Content Landing]
Views 450
Citations 0
Correction
July 2014

Incorrect Information in Table and Text

JAMA Surg. 2014;149(7):749. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2014.1419

In the Original Investigation entitled “The Use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Suspected Appendicitis in Pregnancy: Shortened Length of Stay Without Increase in Hospital Charges” published online May 28, 2014, in JAMA Surgery (doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2013.4658), incorrect information appeared. In Table 3, the number (percentage) of patients in the MR Imaging group who underwent operative exploration should have read 12 (39%). On page E4, the second sentence of the first full paragraph should have read: “Patients without MR imaging had a higher percentage of operative exploration (61% [27 of 44] vs 39% [12 of 31]), which approached statistical significance (odds ratio [OR], 0.45; 95% CI, 0.18-1.16; P = .07).” This article was corrected online.

×