[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.161.249.135. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
Sign In
Individual Sign In
Create an Account
Institutional Sign In
OpenAthens Shibboleth
[Skip to Content Landing]
Views 362
Citations 0
Correction
October 2016

Incorrect Figure Caption

JAMA Surg. 2016;151(10):992. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2016.3785

In the Original Investigation titled “Effectiveness of a Medical vs Revascularization Intervention for Intermittent Leg Claudication Based on Patient-Reported Outcomes,”1 published in this issue of JAMA Surgery, an error occurred in the caption for Figure 1. The caption, which read: “Shown are the numbers of patients from baseline to 6 months.” should be replaced with “Shown are the numbers of patients from baseline to 12 months.” This article was corrected online and in print.

References
1.
Devine  EB, Alfonso-Cristancho  R, Yanez  ND,  et al; Comparative Effectiveness Research Translation Network (CERTAIN) Collaborative.  Effectiveness of a medical vs revascularization intervention for intermittent leg claudication based on patient-reported outcomes [published online August 17, 2016]. JAMA Surg. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2016.2024
×