[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.159.197.114. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
Sign In
Individual Sign In
Create an Account
Institutional Sign In
OpenAthens Shibboleth
[Skip to Content Landing]
Special Feature
February 16, 2009

Image of the Month—Diagnosis

Arch Surg. 2009;144(2):191-192. doi:10.1001/archsurg.2008.582-b
Answer: Rectus Abdominis Intramuscular Hemangioma

The patient underwent an exploratory laparotomy, radical resection of the left abdominal wall mass, and reconstruction of the abdominal defect with a large acellular dermal inset and Marlex mesh (Figure 2). Hemangiomas, the most common tumor of infancy, occur often in the head and neck region, although 25% are found in the trunk. Giant intramuscular hemangiomas are progressively enlarging benign tumors, characterized by variable appearance. They are congenital malformations that may be present at birth and become significant only in adulthood. Intramuscular hemangiomas occur in patients of all ages but are most common in young adults, with 90% occurring before the age of 30.1They may act as infiltrating lesions, leading to the misdiagnosis of angiosarcoma. Hemangiomas are distinguished from angiosarcomas by the lack of pleomorphism or significant endothelial multilayering and by the lack of irregular, ramifying, anastomosing thin-walled channels. In addition to blood vessels infiltrating the spaces between muscle fibers, there is frequently an abundance of adipose tissue.2

Figure 2.
Radical resection of a rectus abdominis intramuscular hemangioma with the feeding vessels ligated.

Radical resection of a rectus abdominis intramuscular hemangioma with the feeding vessels ligated.

The first sizable analysis of intramuscular hemangiomas, a review of 89 cases, was performed by Allen and Enzinger3in 1972. Although rare, intramuscular hemangiomas are of interest clinically because of their ability to mimic aggressive tumors, and because they may cause pain, cosmetic disfigurement, and compressive symptoms. Pain can be a symptom of enlarging hemangiomas or those with spontaneous thrombosis. Intramuscular hemangiomas are defined pathologically as vascular spaces of variable size lined with endothelial cells and separated by fibrous septa localized within the skeletal muscle. These tumors never metastasize; however, they are associated with a 20% local recurrence rate, which is thought to be related to inadequate primary surgical excision.2,4

Radical resection remains the most effective treatment for giant intramuscular hemangiomas and often results in permanent cure. Giant intramuscular hemangiomas are challenging to the surgeon in that they have a tendency to recur if they are not completely resected and if their feeding and draining vessels are not identified and divided. We recommend performing one-stage radical en block resection of these tumors at first diagnosis with abdominal wall reconstruction.

Return to Quiz Case.

Box Section Ref ID

Submissions

The Editor welcomes contributions to the Image of the Month. Manuscripts should be submitted via our online manuscript submission and review system (http://manuscripts.archsurg.com). Articles and photographs accepted will bear the contributor's name. Manuscript criteria and information are per the Instructions for Authors for Archives of Surgery(http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/misc/ifora.dtl). No abstract is needed, and the manuscript should be no more than 3 typewritten pages. There should be a brief introduction, 1 multiple-choice question with 4 possible answers, and the main text. No more than 2 photographs should be submitted. There is no charge for reproduction and printing of color illustrations.

Back to top
Article Information

Correspondence:Emad Kandil, MD, Department of Surgery, Tulane University School of Medicine, 1430 Tulane Ave, Box SL-22, New Orleans, LA 70112 (ekandil@tulane.edu).

Accepted for Publication:May 29, 2007.

Author Contributions:Study concept and design:Kandil, Campbell, and Tufaro. Acquisition of data: Kandil, Campbell, and Tufaro. Analysis and interpretation of data:Campbell and Tufaro. Drafting of the manuscript:Kandil and Tufaro. Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Campbell and Tufaro. Administrative, technical, and material support: Kandil, Campbell, and Tufaro. Study supervision:Tufaro.

Financial Disclosure:None reported.

References
1.
Stimpson  N Infiltrating angiolipomata of skeletal muscle. Br J Surg 1971;58 (6) 464- 466
PubMedArticle
2.
McGee  JIPWright  NADick  MSlack  MPE Oxford Textbook of Pathology. Vol 2a. New York, NY Oxford University Press1992;
3.
Allen  PWEnzinger  FM Hemangioma of skeletal muscle: an analysis of 89 cases. Cancer 1972;29 (1) 8- 22
PubMedArticle
4.
Quinn  PSSieunarine  KLawrence-Brown  MTan  P Intramuscular haemangiomas: hookwire localization prior to surgical excision: report of four cases. ANZ J Surg 2001;71 (1) 62- 66
PubMedArticle
×