[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.163.92.62. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
Sign In
Individual Sign In
Create an Account
Institutional Sign In
OpenAthens Shibboleth
[Skip to Content Landing]
Citations 0
Special Feature
June 2010

Image of the Month—Diagnosis

Arch Surg. 2010;145(6):596. doi:10.1001/archsurg.2010.93-b
Answer: Presacral Neoplasm

Presacral neoplasms are rare, with an incidence of 1 in 40 000 hospital admissions.1,2 Following Uhlig and Johnson’s1 classification scheme, presacral tumors are categorized as congenital, neurogenic, or osseus. Several other types of soft tissue tumors such as lipomas or sarcomas fall into the miscellaneous category. Two-thirds of all presacral tumors are congenital, and this patient's pathology was consistent with one such congential tumor, a cystic hamartoma. Two-thirds of congenital tumors are benign, and other examples include epidermoid and dermoid cysts and anterior sacral meningoceles. Sacrococcygeal chordoma, a solid tumor, is the most common malignant congenital lesion in the presacral space.3

Because most presacral tumors have an indolent course, they are often discovered incidentally on periodic rectal examination or on imaging studies obtained for other reasons. The Mayo Clinic reported that almost all (97%) presacral tumors were palpable on digital rectal examination,4 although we could not palpate the lesion in our patient until she had received general anesthesia. We suspect this was owing to her obesity and because the lesion was drained prior to our evaluation. Presacral neoplasms most commonly present with vague lower back or perineal pain that is aggravated by sitting or defecation.4 The presence of a postanal dimple should alert the examiner to the possibility of a presacral neoplasm, especially congenital lesions like epidermoid, dermoid, or enterogenous cysts, as they frequently communicate with the skin. These congenital cysts are more common in women and are frequently misdiagnosed as anorectal abscesses of the typical cryptoglandular variety.4 Computed tomography is the optimal imaging method to differentiate between solid and cystic masses and to identify cortical bone destruction that is associated with chordomas.2 Magnetic resonance imaging complements computed tomographic findings by providing enhanced soft tissue resolution and identifying cord anomalies such as a meningocele.5

The indications for preoperative percutaneous biopsy are somewhat controversial. In general, biopsy should be reserved for solid tumors with imaging characteristics that make them suspicious for malignancy. Preoperative tissue diagnosis in some solid tumors may guide surgical margins or dictate preoperative chemoradiation therapy. Presacral lesions that are cystic rarely require biopsy. Although 10% to 38% of patients with cystic lesions contain some component of malignancy,6 unnecessary instrumentation of these lesions may predispose them to infectious complications. If biopsy is necessary, it should never be performed transrectally.7

Presacral neoplasms are resected if there is a possibility of malignancy, symptoms, or (cystic lesions) infection. Furthermore, repeated procedures to drain the infections may risk incontinence. The choice of operative approach is determined by physical examination and preoperative imaging. If the examining digit can get around most of the lesion during digital examination or if the lesion is below S3 on imaging studies, they can usually be managed via a posterior approach involving a para-sacrococcygeal incision. Tumors above the S3 level may necessitate either an anterior or a combined anterior and posterior approach.8 Some have argued that a coccygectomy must be performed for all congenital cystic lesions because the coccyx is believed to contain totipotent cells that lead to recurrence.6,9 In this case, the patient was positioned prone and a para-sacrococcygeal incision was used. An assistant's gloved hand was inserted into the rectum to push up on the lesion and help deliver it into the operative field to facilitate dissection. The lesion was excised en bloc with its multiple cystic extensions and the overlying skin containing the dimple (Figure 2). Pathologic analysis revealed a dominant cyst with multiple satellites containing squamous, ciliated pseudostratified columnar and cuboidal epithelium. Presence of these varied epithelial tissues along with a discontinuous smooth muscle component but absence of skin adnexal structures or neural plexuses differentiates cystic hamartoma from teratomas or other congenital lesions.10 The literature reports 43 total cases of cystic hamartoma with 17 reported cases of malignancy arising in these lesions since 1988.10 Our patient did not have any component of malignancy in the specimen.

Figure 2. En bloc excision of dominant cystic component, attached satellite cyst, and overlying skin dimple.

Figure 2. En bloc excision of dominant cystic component, attached satellite cyst, and overlying skin dimple.

Return to Quiz Case.

Back to top
Article Information

Correspondence: Joshua M. Eberhardt, MD, Loyola University Medical Center, Department of Surgery, 2160 South First Avenue, Maywood, IL 60153 (jeberhardt@lumc.edu).

Accepted for Publication: May 21, 2009.

Author Contributions:Study concept and design: Schneider and Eberhardt. Acquisition of data: Schneider, Harford, and Eberhardt. Analysis and interpretation of data: Schneider and Eberhardt. Drafting of the manuscript: Schneider and Eberhardt. Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Harford and Eberhardt. Administrative, technical, and material support: Schneider. Study supervision: Harford and Eberhardt.

Financial Disclosure: None reported.

References
1.
Uhlig  BEJohnson  RL Presacral tumors and cysts in adults Dis Colon Rectum1975187581589
PubMed
2.
Singer  MACintron  JRMartz  JESchoetz  DJAbcarian  H Retrorectal cyst: a rare tumor frequently misdiagnosed J Am Coll Surg20031966880886
PubMed
3.
Whittaker  LDPemberton  JD Tumors ventral to the sacrum Ann Surg1938107196106
PubMed
4.
Jao  SWBeart  RW  JrSpencer  RJReiman  HMIlstrup  DM Retrorectal tumors: Mayo Clinic experience, 1960-1979 Dis Colon Rectum1985289644652
PubMed
5.
Lee  KSGower  DJ McWhorter  JMAlbertson  DA The role of MR imaging in the diagnosis and treatment of anterior sacral maningocele: report of two cases. J Neurosurg1988694628631
PubMed
6.
Prasad  ARAmin  MBRandolph  TL Retrorectal cystic hamartoma: report of 5 caes with malignancy arising in 2 Arch Pathol Lab Med2000124725729
7.
Lev-Chelouche  DGutman  MGoldman  G  et al Presacral tumors. Surgery20031335473478
PubMed
8.
Localio  SAEng  KRanson  JHC Abdominosacral approach for retrorectal tumors Ann Surg19801915555560
PubMed
9.
Aktuğ  THakguder  GSarioğlu  SAkgür  FMOlguner  MPabuçcuoğlu  U Sacrococcygeal extraspinal ependymomas J Pediatr Surg2000353515518
PubMed
10.
Killingsworth  CGadacz  TR Tailgut cyst (retrorectal cystic hamartoma): report of a case and review of the literature Am Surg2005718666673
PubMed
×