[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.205.111.118. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
Sign In
Individual Sign In
Create an Account
Institutional Sign In
OpenAthens Shibboleth
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
September 1967

Hemodynamic Patterns After Acute Anesthetized and Unanesthetized TraumaEvaluation of the Sequence of Changes in Cardiac Output and Derived Calculations

Author Affiliations

Chicago
From the Department of Surgical Research, Division of Surgery, Hektoen Institute for Medical Research, Cook County Hospital, and the University of Illinois, Chicago.

Arch Surg. 1967;95(3):492-499. doi:10.1001/archsurg.1967.01330150168021
Abstract

THE CARDIOVASCULAR derangements occurring with both hemorrhagic and traumatic shock were described over 20 years ago by Cournand, Richards and coworkers1,2 as decreased cardiac output and increased peripheral resistance. Since then there has been a tendency in some circles to assume that shock, irrespective of the precipitating events, is associated with low cardiac output and high resistance. More recently, however, other workers3-10 have described increased or no appreciable changes in cardiac output and decreased or no change in resistance in various types of clinical shock. The relatively small numbers of patients in the various reported series may account for these apparent discrepancies. An alternative explanation for these differences is that shock may represent a rather large waste basket of conditions, in which various factors play significant roles in producing one or more types of circulatory disturbances. Furthermore, it is entirely possible that patients who have sustained shock

References
1.
Cournand, A., et al:  Studies of Circulation in Clinical Shock , Surgery 13:964, 1943.
2.
Richards, D.W., Jr.:  Circulation in Traumatic Shock in Man , Harvey Lect 39:217, 1944.
3.
Shoemaker, W.C., et al:  Hemodynamic Measurements in Various Types of Clinical Shock , Arch Surg 93:189-195, 1966.Article
4.
Brown, R.S., et al:  Comparative Evaluation of Sympathomimetic Amines in Clinical Shock , Circulation 34:260-271, 1966.Article
5.
Carey, J.S., et al:  Cardiac Function in Shock: Responses to Volume Loading and Isoproterenol Infusion , Circulation 35:327, 1967.Article
6.
Hopkins, R.W., et al:  Hemodynamic Aspects of Hemorrhagic and Septic Shock , JAMA 191:127, 1965.Article
7.
Wilson, R.F.; Jablonski, D.V.; and Thal, A.P.:  The Usage of Dibenzyline in Clinical Shock , Surgery 56:172, 1964.
8.
Wilson, R.F., et al:  Hemodynamic Measurements in Septic Shock , Arch Surg 91:121, 1965.Article
9.
Heilbrunn, A., and Allbritten, F.F.:  Cardiac Output During and Following Surgical Operations , Ann Surg 152:197, 1960.Article
10.
Gilbert, R.P., et al:  Hemodynamics of Shock Due to Infection , J Lab Clin Med 44:801, 1954.
11.
Hamilton, W.F., et al:  Studies on the Circulation , Amer J Physiol 99:534, 1932.
12.
Guyton, A.C.: Circulatory Physiology, Cardiac Output and Its Regulation , Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders, Co., 1963.
13.
Carey, J.S., et al:  Comparison of Hemodynamic Responses to Whole Blood and Plasma Expanders in Clinical Traumatic Shock , Surg Gynec Obstet 121:1059, 1965.
×