[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.147.241.171. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
Sign In
Individual Sign In
Create an Account
Institutional Sign In
OpenAthens Shibboleth
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
March 1970

Prevention of Likely Wound InfectionsProphylactic Closed Antibiotic-Detergent Irrigation

Author Affiliations

Des Moines, Iowa
From the Department of Surgery, Veterans Administration Hospital, Des Moines, Iowa.

Arch Surg. 1970;100(3):229-231. doi:10.1001/archsurg.1970.01340210005002
Abstract

Wound infections continue to plague the surgeon, despite the development of antibiotics and improved aseptic technique. The development of infection in clean surgical wounds depends upon many factors, not the least being the presence of pathogenic bacteria. Probably wound infection is the result of the interaction of many local environmental factors such as the blood supply, modified by the trauma of surgery, the general condition of the patient, the contamination of the ambient air, the suture material used, and surgical skill. Since the basis of all wound infection is bacteria, infection could theoretically be eliminated if the organisms could be totally eradicated.

Systemic prophylactic antibiotics have fallen into disrepute and are used by most surgeons only in selected circumstances. In presenting this paper, the literature has been reviewed and a case is presented in order to emphasize the efficacy of topical antibiotic detergent irrigation in the prevention of wound infection

References
1.
Koch SL:  The primary treatment of wounds . Minn Med 24:747-749, 1941.
2.
Mason ML:  The surgical principles involved in the treatment of open injuries . West J Surg 45:239-248, 1937.
3.
Miles AA:  Nonspecific defense reactions in bacterial infections . Ann NY Acad Sci 66:356-369, 1956.Article
4.
Singleton AO Jr, Julian J:  An experimental evaluation of methods used to prevent infection in wounds which have been contaminated with feces . Ann Surg 151:912-916, 1960.Article
5.
Peterson LW:  Prophylaxis of wound infection: Studies with particular reference to soaps and irrigation . Arch Surg 50:177-183, 1945.Article
6.
Condie JD, Ferguson DJ:  Experimental wound infections: Contamination versus surgical technique . Surgery 50:367-371, 1961.
7.
Taylor FW:  An experimental evaluation of operative wound irrigation . Surg Gynec Obstet 113:465-470, 1961.
8.
Hoffman E, Reback JF:  Subcutaneous space contamination . Amer Surg 24:364-366, 1958.
9.
Bingham R:  Prevention of bone and joint infections . Amer J Orthop 9:114-21, 1967.
10.
Grace EJ, Bryson V:  Chronic osteomyelitis in war wounded . New York J Med 47:2204-2205, 1947.
11.
Mitra RN, Grace EJ:  Further studies on the treatment of chronic osteomyelitis with topical detergent-antibiotic therapy . Antibiot Ann 4:455-466, 1956-1957.
12.
Brunner R, Kraushaar A, Prohaska E:  Inhibition of penicillinase and reduction of resistance in vitro in staphylococci by surface active substances . Antibiot Ann 7:169-174, 1959-1960.
13.
Compere EL, Metzger WI, Mitra RM:  The treatment of pyogenic bone and joint infections by closed irrigation (circulation) with a non-toxic detergent and one or more antbiotics . J Bone Joint Surg 49A:614-624, 1967.
×