[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.211.41.181. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
Sign In
Individual Sign In
Create an Account
Institutional Sign In
OpenAthens Shibboleth
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
September 1976

High Hopes and Malpractice

Author Affiliations

Brookline, Mass

Arch Surg. 1976;111(9):1042. doi:10.1001/archsurg.1976.01360270114026

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

It is myopic and misleading to consider the malpractice phenomenon apart from the society in which it occurs. Yet, this context has received too little attention.

Most litigation arises when the medical outcome falls short of the patient's expectations. Accountability is soon the issue, and the physician, the hospital, personnel—each or all—become the culprits, sometimes justifiably, often not.

The purpose of this communication is not to absolve the incompetent and negligent, but to examine some factors that engender the malpractice sequence.

An apparent paradox in our culture is the mixture of myth and science, of rationality and irrationality. Technological prowess has led us to expect that "all is possible." We are primed to expect more than we are likely to receive. It is hard not to become a victim of false hopes in a land where cigarette smokers are depicted as winning a pliant beauty, not a fatal cancer; where

×