[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.158.169.168. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
Sign In
Individual Sign In
Create an Account
Institutional Sign In
OpenAthens Shibboleth
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
August 1977

Polyurethane Foam (Bentley) Micropore Blood Transfusion Filter-Reply

Arch Surg. 1977;112(8):1020. doi:10.1001/archsurg.1977.01370080118021

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

In Reply.—Dr Wuller's points are all valid, and I agree with him. Certainly, any device that poses a risk of air embolism ought not to be used, and the value of filtering debris in low volume transfusions is dubious. We favor a policy of using filters only when transfusions of more than 4 units, ie, 2,000 ml, are anticipated.

I also share Dr Wuller's feeling that the evidence for the value of these filters is largely circumstantial. Direct proof that they have major effects on morbidity and mortality is very difficult to obtain in humans. It would be easy to design a clinical study wherein two groups of patients would be investigated. The only variable distinguishing one group from the other would be the use of blood filters. All other variables bearing on the chief target organ, the lung (eg, transfusion volume, type and extent of bacterial infection, type and volume of noncolloidal

×