[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.161.249.135. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
Sign In
Individual Sign In
Create an Account
Institutional Sign In
OpenAthens Shibboleth
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
April 1979

Evaluation of Intragastric pH in Acutely Ill Patients

Author Affiliations

From the Department of Surgery, St Louis University.

Arch Surg. 1979;114(4):511-514. doi:10.1001/archsurg.1979.01370280165027
Abstract

• The effect of various modalities on maintaining a high intragastric pH in acutely ill patients was evaluated. Twelve patients with one or more organ system failures had the effect of nasogastric suction, intragastric antacid instillation, and intravenous cimetidine administration on intragastric pH determined by an indwelling, intragastric pH probe. Each therapeutic modality was administered for 12 hours and the order of performance randomized. Nasogastric suction was associated with a constant intragastric pH of < 2.0. Mean intragastric pH with cimetidine administration was significantly higher than with antacid administration and consistently > 5.0. If low intragastric pH represents susceptibility to acute mucosal lesions, cimetidine therapy was more effective than antacids in the doses and frequency of administration used in this study in maintaining a high intragastric pH, and it may be effective in preventing stress ulcer formation.

(Arch Surg 114:511-514, 1979)

References
1.
Simonian SJ, Curtis LE:  Treatment of hemorrhagic gastritis by antacid . Ann Surg 184:429-434, 1976.Article
2.
Merereau WA, Hinchey EJ:  Effect of gastric acidity on gastric ulceration induced by hemorrhage in the rat, utilizing a gastric chamber technique . Gastroenterology 64:1130-1135, 1973.
3.
Moody FG, Cheung LY, Simons MA, et al:  Stress and the acute gastric mucosal lesion . Am J Dig Dis 21:148-154, 1976.Article
4.
McAlhany JC, Czaja AJ, Pruitt BA:  Antacid control of complications from acute gastro-duodenal disease after burns . J Trauma 16:645-647, 1976.Article
5.
Hastings PR, Skillman JJ, Bushell LS, et al:  Antacid titration in the prevention of acute gastrointestinal bleeding: A controlled randomized trial in 100 critically ill patients . N Engl J Med 298:1041-1045, 1978.Article
6.
Gillespie G, Gray GR, Smith IS, et al: Short Term and Maintenance Cimetidine Treatment in Severe Duodenal Ulceration . Second International Symposium on H2 Receptor Antagonists, Amsterdam, Excerpta Medica, 1977, pp 240-247.
7.
Black JW, Duncan CJ, Durant CR, et al:  Definition and antagonism of histamine H, receptors . Nature 236:385-390, 1972.Article
8.
Kaminski DL, Ruwart MJ, Jellinek M:  Effect of the histamine (H2) inhibitor metiamide on histamine-stimulated bile flow in dogs . Am J Physiol 231:516-521, 1976.
9.
Grossman MI, Konturek SJ:  Inhibition of acid secretion in dog by metiamide, a histamine antagonist acting on H2 receptors . Gastroenterology 66:517-521, 1974.
10.
Hollander D, Hossain Z, Sufi AM:  Inhibition of nocturnal acid secretion in duodenal ulcer patients by an H2 histamine antagonist-cimetidine . Am J Dig Dis 21:361-365, 1976.Article
11.
Lennard-Jones JE, Babouris N:  Effect of different foods on the acidity of the gastric contents in patients with duodenal ulcer . Gut 6:113-117, 1965.Article
12.
Moore EW:  Determination of pH by the glass electrode: pH meter calibration for gastric analysis . Gastroenterology 54:501-507, 1968.
13.
Bircher J, Mann CV, Carlson HC, et al:  Intraluminal and juxtamucosal duodenal pH . Gastroenterology 48:472-477, 1965.
14.
Skillman JJ, Gould SA, Chung RSK, et al:  The gastric mucosal barrier: Clinical and experimental studies in critically ill and normal man, and in the rabbit . Ann Surg 72:564-584, 1970.Article
15.
Fordtran JB, Walsh JH:  Gastric acid secretion rate and buffer content of the stomach after eating . J Clin Invest 52:645-657, 1973.Article
16.
Abasov I, Iof I:  Application of intragastric pH-metry for diagnostic and therapeutic control of gastric diseases . Am J Gastroenterol 67:229-234, 1977.
17.
Archambault AP, Rouelstad RA, Carlson HC:  In situ pH of duodenal bulb content in normal and duodenal ulcer subjects . Gastroenterology 52:940-947, 1967.
18.
Rhodes J, Apsimon HT, Lawrie JH:  pH of the contents of the duodenal bulb in relation to duodenal ulcer . Gut 7:502-508, 1966.Article
19.
Levine BA, Schwesinger WH, Serinek KP, et al:  Cimetidine prevents reduction in gastric mucosal blood flow during shock . Surgery 84:113-119, 1978.
20.
McGregor CGA, Ogg LJ, Smith IS, et al:  Immunological and other laboratory studies of patients receiving short-term cimetidine therapy . Lancet 1:122-123, 1977.Article
21.
Ufberg MH, Brooks CM, Bosanac PR, et al:  Transient neutropenia in a patient receiving cimetidine . Gastroenterology 73:635-638, 1977.
22.
Bureand WL, Gleadle RI, Mills JG, et al: The Effect of Cimetidine on Renal Function . Second International Symposium on H2 Receptor Antagonists, Amsterdam, Excerpta Medica, 1977, pp 67-74.
23.
Jones RH, Rudge CJ, Bewich M, et al:  Cimetidine: Prophylaxis against upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage after renal transplantation . Br Med J 1:398-400, 1978.Article
24.
Macdougall BRD, Bailey RJ, Williams R:  H2-receptor antagonists and antacids in the prevention of acute gastrointestinal hemorrhage in fulminant hepatic failure . Lancet 1:617-619, 1977.Article
×