[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.161.155.6. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
Sign In
Individual Sign In
Create an Account
Institutional Sign In
OpenAthens Shibboleth
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
March 1983

Effectiveness of a Surgical Wound Surveillance Program

Author Affiliations

From the Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin (Drs Condon and Malangoni) and the Surgical (Dr Schulte) and Research (Ms Anderson-Teschendorf) Services, Wood Veterans Administration Medical Center, Milwaukee.

Arch Surg. 1983;118(3):303-307. doi:10.1001/archsurg.1983.01390030035006
Abstract

• A five-year surgical wound surveillance program included the following features: (1) observations were made by a trained nurse-surveyor; (2) all surgical services, without exception, were surveyed; (3) the nurse-surveyor reported directly to the Chief, Surgical Service; (4) all infected wounds and all suspected of harboring an infection were observed daily by the nurse-surveyor; (5) all wounds were inspected on the third and seventh postoperative days, at hospital discharge, and at a follow-up clinic visit; and (6) cultures were obtained from all infected wounds. Data concerning infections for all surgical services were published each month at the mortality-morbidity conference. The number of wounds closed primarily and the number of infected wounds were recorded, together with calculations of wound infection rates by operation class, for each surgical service and for the whole hospital. During the study, the rate of wound infections progressively declined. The overall incidence decreased from 3.5% before the study began to less than 1% at its conclusion.

(Arch Surg 1983;118:303-307)

References
1.
Gardner AMN, Stamp M, Bowgen JA, et al:  The infection control sister . Lancet 1962;2:710-711.Article
2.
Mulholland SG, Creed J, DiGrauf LA, et al:  Analysis and significance of nosocomial infection rates . Ann Surg 1974;180:827-830.Article
3.
Cruse PJE, Foord R:  The epidemiology of wound infection: A ten-year prospective study of 62,939 wounds . Surg Clin North Am 1980;60:27-40.
4.
Cruse PJE:  Wound infection surveillance . Rev Infect Dis 1981;3:734-737.Article
5.
Ad Hoc Committee of the Committee on Trauma, Division of Medical Sciences, National Academy of Sciences-National Research Council:  Postoperative wound infections: The influence of ultraviolet irradiation of the operating room and of various other factors . Ann Surg 1964;160( (suppl) ):1-92.Article
6.
Polk HC Jr:  The value of a nurse-epidemiologist in the control of surgical infection . Surg Clin North Am 1975;55:1277-1282.
7.
Edwards LD:  The epidemiology of 2,056 remote site infections and 1,966 surgical wound infections occurring in 1,865 patients: A four year study of 40,923 operations at Rush-Presbyterian-St Luke's Hospital, Chicago . Ann Surg 1976;184:758-766.Article
8.
Altemeier WA, Burke JF, Pruitt BA Jr, et al (eds): Manual on Control of Infection in Surgical Patients . Philadelphia, JB Lippincott Co, 1976.
9.
Brachman PS, Dan BB, Haley RW, et al:  Nosocomial surgical infections: Incidence and cost . Surg Clin North Am 1980;60:15-25.
10.
Farber BF, Wenzel RP:  Postoperative wound infection rates: Results of prospective statewide surveillance . Am J Surg 1980;140:343-346.Article
11.
Davis JM, Wolff B, Cunningham TF, et al:  Delayed wound infection: An 11-year survey . Arch Surg 1982;117:113-117.Article
12.
Garner JS, Bennett JV, Scheckler WE, et al:  Surveillance of nosocomial infections. Proceedings of the International Conference on Nosocomial Infections . Atlanta , (Aug 3) -6, 1970, pp 277-281.
×