[Skip to Content]
Sign In
Individual Sign In
Create an Account
Institutional Sign In
OpenAthens Shibboleth
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
September 1985

Emergency Intravenous Pyelography in the Trauma PatientA Reexamination of the Indications

Author Affiliations

From the Division of Trauma, University of California School of Medicine, San Diego (Drs Brahme and Wachtel and Mr Mulligan) and the Department of Surgery, Albany (NY) Medical College (Dr Fortune). Dr Wachtel is now with Good Samaritan Hospital, Phoenix.

Arch Surg. 1985;120(9):1056-1059. doi:10.1001/archsurg.1985.01390330066014
Abstract

• Because of the high incidence of abnormal intravenous pyelograms (IVPs) in victims of blunt trauma undergoing resuscitation, a retrospective review of the Trauma Registry at the University of California, San Diego Medical Center, was undertaken to evaluate the indications for ordering this test. The charts of 216 patients were reviewed, all of whom had formal IVPs (four films) done as an emergency procedure at the time of admission. In this study, special attention was directed toward comparing both the degree of hematuria and the anatomic site of injury with the results of the IVP. A total of 20 renal injuries was detected by IVP. Of these injuries, all but one had hematuria that was greater than 50 red blood cells per high-power field. All but one of the abnormal IVPs were associated with obvious abdominal injuries. The results of the IVP influenced the clinical course of only one patient in the entire series. We conclude that the use of the formal IVP (four films) in the resuscitation phase of treating the multiply traumatized patient be reserved for those patients with penetrating abdominal injury or with hematuria consisting of greater than 50 red blood cells per high-power field. For any major blunt abdominal trauma without significant hematuria, a more simple and rapid study (one-shot IVP) to demonstrate bilateral nephrograms is probably adequate to rule out occult renal artery thrombosis.

(Arch Surg 1985;120:1056-1059)

References
1.
McAnnich JW:  Acute renal artery thrombosis from blunt trauma . Urology 1975;6:74-77.Article
2.
Sagalowsky AI, McConnell JD, Peters PC:  Renal trauma requiring surgery: An analysis of 185 cases . J Trauma 1983;23:128-131.Article
3.
McDonald EJ Jr, Korobkin M, Jacobs RP, et al:  The role of emergency excretory urography in the evaluation of blunt abdominal trauma . AJR 1976;126:739-742.Article
4.
Méndez R:  Renal trauma . J Urol 1977:118:698-708.
5.
Guice K, Oldham K, Eide B, et al:  Hematuria after blunt trauma: When is pyelography useful? J Trauma 1983;23:305-311.Article
6.
Peterson N:  The significance of delayed post-traumatic renal hemorrhage . J Urol 1978;119:563-565.
7.
Mogensen P, Agger P, Ostergaard AH:  A conservative approach to the management of blunt renal trauma . Br J Urol 1980;52:338-341.Article
8.
McNeil BJ, Mellins HZ:  Evaluation of diagnostic tests in uroradiology . Radiol Clin North Am 1979;17:175-185.
9.
Charters AC, Bailey JR:  Experience with a simplified trauma registry profile of trauma at a university hospital . J Trauma 1979;19:13-17.Article
10.
Baker SP, O'Neill B, Haddon W Jr:  The injury severity score: A method for describing patients with multiple injuries and evaluating emergency care . J Trauma 1974;14:187-196.Article
11.
Griffen WO, Belin RP, Ernst CB, et al:  Intravenous pyelography in abdominal trauma . J Trauma 1978;18:387-392.Article
12.
Older RA, Moore AV, McLelland R:  Excretory urography: Update 1980 . CRC Crit Rev Diagn Imaging July 1981;16:1-26.
13.
Elkin M, Ming C, DePeredes RG:  Roentgenologic evolution of renal trauma with emphasis on renal angiography . AJR 1966;98:1-26.Article
14.
Bankowsky LH, Wolfel DA, Lackner LH:  Considerations in diagnosis and management of renal trauma . J Trauma 1970;10:587-597.Article
15.
Schucker B:  Drip infusion pyelography: Indications and applications in urologic roentgen diagnosis . Radiology 1964;83:12-21.Article
16.
Gibson S, Kuzmarov IW, McClure DR, et al:  Blunt renal trauma: The value of a conservative approach to major injuries in chemically stable patients . Can J Surg 1982;25:25-26.
17.
Heisel SS, Smith EH:  Renal trauma: A comprehensive review and radiologic assessment . Crit Rev Radiol Nucl Med 1974;5:251-259.
18.
Lowsley CS, Menning JH:  Treatment of rupture of the kidney . J Urol 1941;45:253-271.
19.
Wein AJ, Arger PH, Murphy JJ:  Controversial aspects of blunt renal trauma . J Trauma 1977;17:662-666.Article
20.
Bergquist D, Hedelin H, Lindblad B:  Blunt renal trauma . Scand J Urol Nephrol 1980;14:177-180.Article
21.
Cass AS, Ireland GW:  Comparison of the conservative and surgical management of the more severe degrees of renal trauma in multiple injured patients . J Urol 1973;109:8-10.
22.
Cass AS:  Renal trauma in the multiple injured patient . J Urol 1975;114:495-497.
23.
Bergquist D, Grenabo L, Hedelin H, et al:  Long-time follow-up of patients with conservatively treated blunt renal injuries . Acta Chir Scand 1980;146:291-294.
24.
McAnnich JW:  Acute renal artery thrombosis from blunt trauma . Urology 1975;6:74-77.Article
25.
Scott R, Carlton CE, Goldman M:  Penetrating injuries of the kidney: Analysis of 181 patients . J Urol 1969;101:247-253.
26.
Sandler CM, Tacombs BD:  Computed tomographic evaluation of blunt renal injuries . Radiology 1981;141:461-466.Article
×