[Skip to Content]
Sign In
Individual Sign In
Create an Account
Institutional Sign In
OpenAthens Shibboleth
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
July 1986

Mammography of Women With Suspicious Breast Lumps

Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Surgery (Dr Young) and Obstetrics and Gynecology (Dr Herman), Framingham Union Hospital, Framingham, Mass, and Boston University; Departments of Radiology, Faulkner Hospital, Jamaica Plain, Mass, and Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston (Dr Sadowsky); and Yale University, New Haven, Conn (Mr Young).

Arch Surg. 1986;121(7):807-809. doi:10.1001/archsurg.1986.01400070073015
Abstract

• We analyzed 342 women who had suspicious breast lumps to determine if preoperative mammography could improve the malignancy yield of biopsy procedures. The number of women with cancer of the breast and false-negative mammogram reports ranged from 11% to 25%, depending on how equivocal mammogram reports were interpreted. Therefore, women with clinically suspicious breast lumps should undergo biopsy regardless of mammographic findings. A significant difference in the mean (±SD) predictive value of a positive mammogram existed between women above and below the age of 50 years (80±8 vs 43±14) because of the age-specific relative prevalence of benign and malignant disease, and because mammography had difficulty distinguishing between benign and malignant lumps (specificity, 70). Preoperative mammography of women with suspicious breast lumps is indicated to screen for occult carcinoma, to prevent biopsy sampling errors, and to judge the adequacy of lumpectomy if the lesion is malignant.

(Arch Surg 1986;121:807-809)

References
1.
Spivey GH, Perry BW, Clark VA, et al:  Predicting the risk of cancer at the time of breast biopsy: Variation in the benign to malignant ratio . Am Surg 1982;48:326-332.
2.
Galen RS, Gambino SR: Beyond Normality: The Predictive Value and Efficiency of Medical Diagnoses . New York, John Wiley & Sons Inc, 1975.
3.
Sickles EA, Klein DL, Goodson WH III, et al:  Mammography after needle aspiration of palpable breast masses . Am J Surg 1983;145:395-397.Article
4.
Patton DD:  Introduction to clinical decision making . Semin Nucl Med 1978;4:273-282.Article
5.
Lewis JD, Milbrath JR, Shaffer KA, et al:  Which breast to biopsy: An expanding dilemma . Ann Surg 1976;184:253-257.Article
6.
Mahoney L, Csima A:  Use and abuse of mammography in the early diagnosis of breast cancer . Can J Surg 1983;26:262-265.
7.
Chamberlain J, Rogers P, Price JL, et al:  Validity of clinical examination and mammography as screening tests for breast cancer . Lancet 1975;2:1026-1030.Article
8.
Mann BD, Giuliano AE, Bassett LW, et al:  Delayed diagnosis of breast cancer as a result of normal mammograms . Arch Surg 1983;118:23-24.Article
9.
Niloff PH, Sheiner NM:  False-negative mammograms in patients with breast cancer . Can J Surg 1981;24:50-52.
10.
Burns PE, Grace MG, Lees AW, et al:  False negative mammograms causing delay in breast cancer diagnosis . J Can Assoc Radiol 1979;30:74-76.
11.
Baker LH:  Breast cancer detection demonstration project: Five-year summary report . CA 1982;32:194-225.
12.
Al-Jurf AS, Jochimsen PR, Urdaneta LF:  Guest editorial: Preoperative mammography in women with palpable breast masses . Breast 1982;8:2-3.
13.
Thomas JM, Fitzharris BM, Redding WH, et al:  Clinical examination, xeromammography, and fine-needle aspiration cytology in diagnosis of breast tumours . Br Med J 1978;2:1139-1141.Article
14.
Meyer JE, Kopans DB:  Analysis of mammographically obvious carcinomas of the breast with benign results upon initial biopsy . Surg Gynecol Obstet 1981;153:570-572.
15.
Kopans DB, Meyer JE, Cohen AM, et al:  Palpable breast masses: The importance of preoperative mammography . JAMA 1981;246:2819-2822.Article
16.
Harris JR, Botnick L, Bloomer WD, et al:  Primary radiation therapy for early breast cancer: The experience at the Joint Center for Radiation Therapy . Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1981;7:1549-1552.Article
17.
Kern WH, Zivolich MR:  The accuracy and consistency of the cytologic classification of squamous lesions of the uterine cervix . Acta Cytol 1977;21:519-523.
18.
Kopans DB, Meyer JE, Sadowsky N:  Breast imaging . N Engl J Med 1984;310:960-967.Article
19.
Shapiro S, Venet W, Strax P, et al:  Ten- to 14-year effect of screening on breast cancer mortality . JNCI 1982;69:349-355.
×