[Skip to Content]
Sign In
Individual Sign In
Create an Account
Institutional Sign In
OpenAthens Shibboleth
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
November 1986

The Changing MammogramA Primary Indication for Needle Localization Biopsy

Author Affiliations

From the Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery (Drs Wilhelm and Wanebo), and the Department of Radiology (Drs de Paredes and Pope), University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville.

Arch Surg. 1986;121(11):1311-1314. doi:10.1001/archsurg.1986.01400110103017
Abstract

• Screening mammography results in improved detection and survival for women with breast cancer. Interval mammographic changes may be one of the major indications for biopsy. Four hundred fifty-two needle localization biopsies carried out for microcalcifications, mass, asymmetric density, or a combination of calcifications with mass or asymmetric density detected 95 cancers (21%). Interval mammographic changes detected 35 cases (17.9%). Invasive cancers constituted 51% of the initial group but only 34% of the cancers detected because of interval change. Benign breast disease occurred in 160 of 195 women who had undergone biopsy because of interval changes. These changes continued into the postmenopausal period. Hyperplasia and/or atypia was found in 57 (35%) of 160 of the interval group. Interval mammographic abnormalities detect significant pathologic changes in the breast and should be considered a major indication for breast biopsy.

(Arch Surg 1986;121:1311-1314)

References
1.
Warren SL:  Roentgenologic study of the breast . AJR 1930;24:113-115.
2.
Egan RL:  Experience with mammography in a tumor institution: Evaluation of 1000 studies . Radiology 1960;75:894-900.Article
3.
Strax P, Venet L, Shapiro S:  Value of mammography in reduction of mortality for breast cancer in mass screening . AJR 1973;117:686-689.Article
4.
Baber LH:  Breast Cancer Detection Demonstration Projects: Fiveyear summary reports . CA 1982;32:194-230.
5.
Rodes MD, Lopez MJ, Blackwell CW, et al:  The impact of breast cancer screening on survival: A five- to ten-year follow-up study . Cancer 1986;57: 581-585.Article
6.
Tabor L, Gad A, Holmberg LH, et al:  Reduction in mortality from breast cancer after mass screening with mammography . Lancet 1985;1: 829-832.Article
7.
American Cancer Society:  Mammographic guidelines 1983 . CA 1983;33:4-9.
8.
Meyer JE, Kopans DB:  Preoperative roentgenographically guided percutaneous localization of occult breast lesions . Arch Surg 1982;117:65-68.Article
9.
Howar MJ:  Nonpalpable mammographic abnormalities: Timing the follow-up studies . AJR 1981;136:923-926.Article
10.
Markowitz M:  The prediction value of certain mammographic signs in screening for breast cancer . Cancer 1983;51:1007-1011.Article
×