[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.205.209.213. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
Sign In
Individual Sign In
Create an Account
Institutional Sign In
OpenAthens Shibboleth
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
January 1987

Old Problems, New and Persistent ChallengesPresidential Address

Author Affiliations

From the Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine.

Arch Surg. 1987;122(1):15-20. doi:10.1001/archsurg.1987.01400130021002
Abstract

From many points of view, infection control has been the most important single advance in the development of human destiny. Before the 17th century, frequent epidemics of diseases now presumed to be smallpox, plague, diphtheria, measles, cholera, and infectious diarrheal diseases, among others, swept through communities, killing as much as 90% of the population within a region. Until recently, as reflected by an increase in the average life span, infection was clearly the most common cause of death. With better nutrition and improved hygiene, world population began to increase enormously as more people lived long enough to propagate (Fig 1). The explosion in scientific methods within the last 150 years, particularly related to control of infection, has resulted in a fivefold increase in the number of human beings populating the earth during that period. Smallpox, one of the most common causes of death in the world just a few hundred

References
1.
Alexander JW:  The contributions of infection control to a century of surgical process . Ann Surg 1985;201:423-428.Article
2.
Altemeier WA, Burke JF, Pruitt BA, et al: American College of Surgeons Manual on Control of Infection in Surgical Patients . Philadelphia, JB Lippincott Co, 1976.
3.
Pruitt BA Jr:  Host-opportunist interactions in surgical infection . Arch Surg 1986;121:13-22.Article
4.
Green JW, Wenzel RP:  Postoperative wound infection: A controlled study of the increased duration of hospital stay and direct cost of hospitalization . Ann Surg 1977;185:264-268.Article
5.
Haley RW, Culver DH, White JW, et al:  The nationwide nosocomial infection rate: A new need for vital statistics . Am J Epidemiol 1985;121: 159-167.
6.
Jarvis WR, White JW, Munn VP, et al:  Nosocomial infection surveillance, 1983 . CDC Surveillance Summaries 1984;33:9SS-21SS.
7.
Alexander JW, Aerni S, Plettner JP:  Development of a safe and effective one-minute preoperative skin preparation . Arch Surg 1985;120: 1357-1361.Article
8.
Cruse PJE, Foord R:  A five-year prospective study of 23 649 surgical wounds . Arch Surg 1973;107:206-210.Article
9.
Olson M, O'Connor M, Schwartz ML:  Surgical wound infections: A five-year prospective study of 20 193 wounds at the Minneapolis VA Medical Center . Ann Surg 1984;199:253-259.Article
10.
Condon RE, Schulte WJ, Malangoni MA, et al:  Effectiveness of a surgical wound surveillance program . Arch Surg 1983;118:303-307.Article
11.
Mead PB, Pories SE, Hall P, et al:  Decreasing the incidence of surgical wound infections: Validation of a surveillance-notification program . Arch Surg 1986;121:458-461.Article
12.
Brewer GE:  Studies in aseptic technique: With a report of some recent observations at Roosevelt Hospital . JAMA 1915;64:1369-1372.Article
×