[Skip to Content]
Sign In
Individual Sign In
Create an Account
Institutional Sign In
OpenAthens Shibboleth
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
October 1989

Changes in Surgical Treatment of Peptic Ulcer Disease Within a Veterans Hospital in the 1970s and the 1980s

Author Affiliations

From the Surgical Service, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland.

Arch Surg. 1989;124(10):1164-1167. doi:10.1001/archsurg.1989.01410100066011
Abstract

• To determine if the surgical treatment of peptic ulcer disease within a Veterans Administration hospital has changed over the past decade, we compared two groups of patients. Group 1 (n=104) had surgery between 1974 and 1977 and group 2 (n=61) had surgery between 1984 and 1987. In group 1, 49 (47%) ulcer operations were performed for chronic symptoms, while in group 2, 11 (18%) were performed for nonemergent reasons. The remaining 55 (53%) patients in group 1 and 50 (82%) in group 2 had operations for complications of peptic ulcer. When expressed per 1000 admissions, the rates of operations for complications were similar (1.08 vs 1.1). The relative proportions of perforation, bleeding, or obstruction were similar for patients in the two groups, as was the American Society of Anesthesiologist's Physical Status rating (3.1 vs 3.2). The fitness score, a scale for assessing preoperative risk with 10 representing the greatest risk, was also similar (6.7 vs 6.8). An American Society of Anesthesiologist's Physical Status value of greater than 3 and a fitness score of greater than 6 indicate that these patients were at high risk with an expected operative mortality of greater than 25%. In fact, the mortalities in groups 1 and 2 for patients having emergency operations for complications were 29% and 30%, respectively. The marked reduction in elective ulcer operations observed in our institution may be due to several factors, including better nonoperative therapy (eg, histamine receptor antagonists), physician preference for nonoperative treatment of chronic ulcers, or a reduced incidence of chronic ulcer within our population. However, the number of emergency operations for complications of ulcer has remained constant. These complications occur in poor-risk patients with concomitant illness, and the operative mortality for these patients is high.

(Arch Surg. 1989;124:1164-1167)

References
1.
Gustavsson S, Kelly K, Milton S, Zenmeister A.  Trends in peptic ulcer surgery: a population-based study in Rochester, Minnesota, 1956-1985 . Gastroenterology . 1988;94:688-694.
2.
Sonnenberg A.  Changes in physician visits for gastric and duodenal ulcer in the United States during 1958-1984 as shown by National Disease and Therapeutic Index (NDTI) . Dig Dis Sci . 1987;32:1-7.Article
3.
Elashoff JD, Grossman MI.  Trends in hospital admissions and death rates for peptic ulcer in the United States from 1970-1978 . Gastroenterology . 1982;78:280-285.
4.
Bonnevie O.  Changing demographics of peptic ulcer disease . Dig Dis Sci . 1985;30:8S-14S.Article
5.
McKay A, McArdle C.  Cimetidine and perforated peptic ulcer . Br J Surg . 1982;69:319-320.Article
6.
Tinker J, Roberts S.  Anesthesia risk . In: Miller RD, ed. Textbook of Anesthesia . New York, NY: Churchill Livingstone Inc; 1986;1:359-380.
7.
Marx GF.  Computer analysis of post-anesthetic deaths . Anesthesiology . 1973;39:54-58.Article
8.
Playforth M, Smith G, Evans M, Pollock A.  Preoperative assessment of fitness score . Br J Surg . 1987;74:890-892.Article
9.
Kurata JH, Honda G, Frankle H.  Hospitalization and mortality rates for peptic ulcers: a comparison of a large HMO and US data . Gastroenterology . 1982;83:1008-1016.
10.
Kurata JH.  Sex and smoking differences in duodenal ulcer mortality . Am J Pub Health . 1986;76:700-702.Article
11.
Susser M.  Period effects, generation effects and age effects in peptic ulcer mortality . J Chronic Dis . 1982;35:29-40.Article
12.
Wyllie J, Clark C, Alexander-Williams J, et al.  Effect of cimetidine on surgery for duodenal ulcer . Lancet . 1981;1:1307-1308.Article
13.
Fineberg H, Pearlman L.  Surgical treatment of peptic ulcer in the United States: trends before and after the introduction of cimetidine . Lancet . 1981;1:1305-1307.Article
14.
McGuire HH.  Emergency operations for gastric and duodenal ulcers in high risk patients . Ann Surg . 1986;203:551-557.Article
15.
Mulholland MW, Debas H.  Chronic duodenal and gastric ulcer . Surg Clin North Am . 1987;67:489-507.
16.
Watkins R, Dennison AR, Collin J.  What has happened to perforated peptic ulcer? Br J Surg . 1984;71:774-776.Article
17.
Herrington J, Davidson J.  Bleeding gastroduodenal ulcers: choice of operations . World J Surg . 1987;11:304-314.Article
18.
Boey J, Wong J.  Perforated duodenal ulcers . World J Surg . 1987;11:319-324.Article
19.
Graham R.  The treatment of perforated duodenal ulcers . Surg Gynecol Obstet . 1937;64:235-238.
×