[Skip to Content]
Sign In
Individual Sign In
Create an Account
Institutional Sign In
OpenAthens Shibboleth
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
May 1994

Mechanical Circulatory Support During Repair of Thoracic Aortic Injuries Improves Morbidity and Prevents Spinal Cord Injury

Author Affiliations

From the Division of Thoracic Surgery, Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington, Seattle.

Arch Surg. 1994;129(5):494-498. doi:10.1001/archsurg.1994.01420290040006
Abstract

Objective:  Evaluation of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) vs simple cross clamping (CC) during repair of traumatic descending thoracic aortic transections.

Design:  A retrospective analysis of all patients admitted with blunt traumatic injury to the descending thoracic aorta from August 1988 through March 1993. Patients were pseudorandomized to simple CC vs MCS according to the on-call surgeons' preferences.

Setting:  A level 1 trauma center in Seattle, Wash.

Patients:  Forty-two patients were admitted. Thirty (71%) survived, 21 of whom underwent repair with MCS and nine underwent repair with CC only.

Intervention:  Prompt aortic repair was performed either primarily or by replacement with a Dacron graft.

Main Outcome Measures:  Operative survivors were examined for new neurologic deficits, renal function, pulmonary failure, gastrointestinal tract complications, sepsis, and length of hospitalization. Causes of death in all patients were determined.

Results:  Twelve patients died, seven before surgery and five during surgery. In survivors, new neurologic deficits occurred in four (44%) of nine patients undergoing repair with CC and in none of the patients undergoing repair with MCS (P=.0005). Mean (±SEM) postoperative serum creatinine levels were higher in patients undergoing repair with CC (256±80 μmol/L [2.9±0.9 mg/dL]) than in patients undergoing repair with MCS (115±18 μmol/L [1.3±0.2 mg/dL]) (P<.05). Patients undergoing repair with CC had longer hospitalization and higher incidence of pulmonary, gastrointestinal, and septic complications, all of which approached statistical significance.

Conclusions:  Mechanical extracorporeal perfusion of the distal aorta during occlusion of the thoracic aorta for traumatic descending thoracic aortic injuries may prevent spinal cord ischemia and reduce postoperative organ dysfunction.(Arch Surg. 1994;129:494-498)

References
1.
Svensson LG, Von Ritter CM, Groeneveld HT, et al.  Cross clamping of the thoracic aorta: influence of aortic shunts, laminectomy, papaverine, calcium channel blocker, allopurinol, and superoxide dismutase on spinal cord blood flow and paraplegia in baboons . Ann Surg . 1986;204:38-47.Article
2.
Colon R, Frazier OH, Cooley DA.  Hypothermic perfusion for protection of the spinal cord during periods of ischemia . Ann Thorac Surg . 1987;43:639-643.Article
3.
Blaisdell FW, Cooley DA.  The mechanism of paraplegia after temporary thoracic aortic occlusion and its relationship to spinal fluid pressure . Surgery . 1961;51:351-355.
4.
Livesay JJ, Cooley DA, Ventemiglia RA, Monten CG, Warrian RK, Brown DM, Duncan JM.  Surgical experience in descending thoracic aneurysmectomy with and without adjuncts to avoid ischemia . Ann Thorac Surg . 1985;39:37-46.Article
5.
Bower TC, Murray MJ, Gloviczki P, Yaksh TL, Hollier LH, Pairolero PC.  Effects of thoracic aortic occlusion and cerebral spinal fluid drainage on regional spinal cord blood flow in dogs: correlation with neurologic outcome . J Vasc Surg . 1989;9:135-144.Article
6.
Mattox KL, Holzman M, Pickard LR, Beall AC, DeBakey ME.  Clamp/repair: a safe technique for treatment of blunt injury to the descending thoracic aorta . Ann Thorac Surg . 1985;40:456-463.Article
7.
Eddy AC, Rusch VW, Marchioro TL, Ashbaugh DA, Verrier ED, Dillard D.  Treatment of traumatic rupture of the thoracic aorta: a fifteen-year experience . Arch Surg . 1990;125:1351-1356.Article
8.
Greenspan L, McLellan BA, Greig H.  Abbreviated injury scale and injury severity score: a scoring chart . J Trauma . 1985;25:60-64.Article
9.
Grossi EA, Krieger KH, Cunningham JN, Culliford AT, Nathan IM, Spencer FC.  Venoarterial bypass: a technique for spinal cord protection . J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg . 1985;89:228-234.
10.
Katz NM, Blackstone EH, Kirklin JW, Karp RB.  Incremental risk factors for spinal cord injury following operation for acute aortic transection . J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg . 1981;81:669-674.
11.
Crowley RA, Turney SZ, Hankins JR, Rodriguez A, Attar S, Shankear BS.  Rupture of thoracic aorta caused by blunt trauma . Ann Thorac Surg . 1990;100: 652-661.
12.
Higgens RS, Sanchez JA, DeGuidis L, et al.  Mechanical circulatory support decreases neurologic complications in the treatment of traumatic injuries of the thoracic aorta . Arch Surg . 1992;127:516-519.Article
13.
Zeiger MA, Clark DE, Morton JR.  Reappraisal of surgical treatment of traumatic transection of the thoracic aorta . J Cardiovasc Surg . 1990;31:607-610.
14.
Olivier HF, Maher TD, Liebler GA, Park SB, Burkholder JA, Magovern GJ.  Use of the biomedicus centrifugal pump in traumatic tears of the thoracic aorta . Ann Thorac Surg . 1984;38:586-591.Article
15.
Read RA, Moore EE, Moore FA, Haenel JB.  Partial left heart bypass for thoracic aortic repair: survival without paraplegia . Arch Surg . 1993;128:746-752.Article
16.
Roberts AJ, Nora JD, Hughes WD, et al.  Cardiac and renal responses to cross-clamping of the descending thoracic aorta . J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg . 1983; 86:732-741.
17.
Sturm JT, Billiar TR, Luxenberg MG, Perry JF.  Risk factors for the development of renal failure following the surgical treatment of traumatic aortic rupture . Ann Thorac Surg . 1987;43:425-427.Article
×