[Skip to Content]
Sign In
Individual Sign In
Create an Account
Institutional Sign In
OpenAthens Shibboleth
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
October 1995

Five-Year Follow-up After Radical Surgery for Colorectal CancerResults of a Prospective Randomized Trial

Author Affiliations

From the Department of Surgery, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland.

Arch Surg. 1995;130(10):1062-1067. doi:10.1001/archsurg.1995.01430100040009
Abstract

Objective:  To determine whether an intensified follow-up of patients with colorectal cancer can lead to improved reresectability and a better long-term survival.

Design:  A prospective randomized trial of 106 patients.

Setting:  Oulu University Hospital, a referral center in northern Finland.

Patients:  A total of 106 consecutive patients who underwent radical resection for colorectal cancer, 54 of whom were randomized into a conventional follow-up group and 52 into an intensified follow-up group.

Main Outcome Measures:  After a 5-year follow-up, the time of detection of recurrence, the recurrence rates, the first method showing recurrence, the mode of recurrence, reresectability, and survival were compared between the groups.

Results:  The recurrences were identified earlier in the intensified follow-up group than in the conventional follow-up group (mean±SD, 10±5 months vs 15±10 months). The overall recurrence rate was 41%, with 39% in the conventional group and 42% in the intensified group. Carcinoembryonic antigen determination was the most common method showing recurrence in both groups. Endoscopy and ultrasound were beneficial in the intensified follow-up group, but computed tomography failed to improve the diagnostics. The mode of recurrence did not differ between the groups. Radical reresections were performed on 19% (8/43) of the patients, 14% (3/21) in the conventional group and 22% (5/22) in the intensified group. The cumulative 5-year survival was 54% in the conventional group and 59% in the intensified group.

Conclusion:  Earlier detection of recurrent colorectal cancer by intensified follow-up does not lead to either significantly increased reresectability or improved 5-year survival.(Arch Surg. 1995;130:1062-1067)

References
1.
Ekman C-A, Gustavson J, Henning A.  Value of a follow-up study of recurrent carcinoma of the colon and rectum . Surg Gynecol Obstet . 1977:145:895-897.
2.
Törnqvist A, Ekelund G, Leandoer L.  The value of intensive follow-up after curative resection for colorectal carcinoma . Br J Surg . 1982;69:725-728.Article
3.
Schiessel R, Wunderlich, Herbst F.  Local recurrence of colorectal cancer: effect of early detection and aggressive surgery . Br J Surg . 1986;73:342-344.Article
4.
Vernava AM, Longo WE, Vrgo KS, Coplin MA, Wade TP. Johnson FE.  Current follow-up strategies after resection of colon cancer: results of a survey of members of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons . Dis Colon Rectum . 1994;37:573-583.Article
5.
Mäkelä J, Haukipuro K, Laitinen S, Kairaluoma M.  Surgical treatment of recurrent colorectal cancer . Arch Surg . 1989;124:1029-1032.Article
6.
Turnbull RB, Kyle K, Watson FR, Spratt J.  Cancer of the colon: the influence of the no-touch isolation technic on survival rates . Ann Surg . 1967;166:420-427.Article
7.
Cutler SJ, Ederer F.  Maximum utilization of the life table method in analyzing survival . J Chronic Dis . 1958;8:699-712.Article
8.
Goligher JC.  What can be done to improve the results in colorectal cancer? Scand J Gastroenterol . 1988;23( (suppl 148) ):190-194.Article
9.
DeVesa JM, Morales V, Enrique JM, et al.  Colorectal cancer: the bases for comprehensive follow-up . Dis Colon Rectum . 1988;31:636-652.Article
10.
Safi F, Link KH, Berger HG.  Is follow-up of colorectal cancer patients worthwhile? Dis Colon Rectum . 1933;36:636-644.Article
11.
Umpley HC, Bristol JB, Rainey JB, Williamson RCN.  Survival of 727 patients with single carcinoma of the large bowel . Dis Colon Rectum . 1984;27:803-810.Article
12.
Willett CGT, Tepper JE, Cohen AM, Orlow E, Welch CE.  Failure following curative resection of colonic carcinoma . Ann Surg . 1984;200:685-690.Article
13.
Schildberg FW, Lange V, Thies E, Meyer G.  Zur Therapie der Rezidive kolorektaler Karzinome . Chirurgie . 1985:56:509-514.
14.
Ovaska JT, Järvinen HJ, Mecklin JP.  The value of a follow-up programme after radical surgery for colorectal carcinoma . Scand J Gastroenterol . 1989;24:16-22.Article
15.
Turk PS, Wanebo HJ.  Results of surgical treatment of nonhepatic recurrence of colorectal carcinoma . Cancer . 1993;71:4267-4277.Article
16.
Martin EW Jr, Cooperman M, Carey LC, Minton JP.  Sixty second-look laparotomies indicated by rise in serial carcinoembryonic antigen . J Surg Res . 1980; 28:389-394.Article
17.
Minton JP, Hoehn JL, Gerber DM.  Results of a 400-patient carcinoembryonic antigen second-look colorectal cancer study . Cancer . 1985;55:1284-1290.Article
18.
Sugarbaker PH, Gianola FJ, Dwyer A. Newman NR.  A simplified plan for follow-up of patients with colon and rectal cancer supported by prospective studies of laboratory and radiological results . Surgery . 1987;102:79-87.
19.
Fantini GA, DeCosse JJ.  Surveillance strategies after resection of carcinoma of the colon and rectum . Surg Gynecol Obstet . 1990;171:267-273.
20.
Kievit J, van de Velde CJ.  Utility and cost of carcinoembryonic antigen monitoring in colon cancer follow-up: a Markov analysis . Cancer . 1990;65:2580-2587.Article
21.
Charnsangavej C.  New imaging modalities for follow-up of colorectal carcinoma . Cancer . 1993;71:4236-4240.Article
22.
Moffat FL Jr, Ketcham AS.  Comprehensive surveillance after curative surgery for adenocarcinoma of the colon . Am J Gastroenterol . 1991;86:939-940.
23.
Fucini C, Tommasi SM, Rosi S, et al.  Follow-up of colorectal cancer resected for cure: an experience with CEA, TPA, CA 19-9: analysis and second-look surgery . Dis Colon Rectum . 1987;30:273-277.Article
24.
O'Dwyer PJ, Mojzisik C, McCabe DP, Farrar WB, Carey LC, Martin EW Jr.  Reoperation directed by carcinoembryonic antigen level: the importance of a thorough preoperative evaluation . Am J Surg . 1988;155:227-230.Article
25.
Stulc JP, Petrelli NJ, Herrera L, Mittelmann A.  Anastomotic recurrence of adenocarcinoma of the colon . Arch Surg . 1986;121:1077-1080.Article
26.
Sanella NA.  Abdominoperineal resection following anterior resection . Cancer . 1976;38:80-84.
27.
Goligher JC.  Neoplasms: surgical treatment . Curr Opin Gastroenterol . 1986:2:22-30.Article
28.
Steele G Jr.  Standard postoperative monitoring of patients after primary resection of colon and rectum cancer . Cancer . 1993;71:4225-4235.Article
29.
Unger WS, Wanebo HJ.  Colonoscopy: an essential monitoring technique after resection of colorectal cancer . Am J Surg . 1983;145:71-76.Article
30.
Larson GM, Bond SJ, Shallcross C, Mullins R, Polk HC Jr.  Colonoscopy after curative resection of colorectal cancer . Arch Surg . 1986;121:535-540.Article
31.
Barlow AP, Thompson MH.  Colonoscopic follow-up after resection for colorectal cancer: a selective policy . Br J Surg . 1993;80:781-784.Article
×