[Skip to Content]
Sign In
Individual Sign In
Create an Account
Institutional Sign In
OpenAthens Shibboleth
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
June 1996

Blunt Thoracic Aortic TraumaA Cost-Utility Approach for Injury Detection

Author Affiliations

From the Department of Surgery, St Paul—Ramsey Medical Center, University of Minnesota, St Paul.

Arch Surg. 1996;131(6):619-626. doi:10.1001/archsurg.1996.01430180045007
Abstract

Objective:  To evaluate the influences of patient preference and treatment costs on the diagnostic approach to blunt aortic trauma.

Methods:  Decision and cost-utility analysis.

Data Sources:  A MEDLINE search of all literature dealing with the diagnosis and management of blunt aortic injury was used to establish assumptions and assign baseline probability estimates. Utility assignments were made from published data and our own assignments. We obtained institution-specific cost data.

Study Selection:  Only randomized, prospective trials that used aortography as the gold standard test were used to assign baseline accuracy of transesophageal echocardiography and dynamic chest computed tomography. Other baseline estimates were taken from class II and class III published data.

Data Synthesis:  A decision tree compared 4 diagnostic approaches for blunt chest trauma after an initial normal chest radiograph: observation with follow-up chest radiography, aortography, transesophageal echocardiography, and dynamic chest computed tomography. Utility (a quality-of-life measure) was assigned to ultimate health states to incorporate patient preference. Chest radiography and aortography had similar utility. Aortography gained 1 quality-adjusted life year for minimal cost. Transesophageal echocardiography and dynamic chest computed tomography lose quality-adjusted life-years at increased cost. No variable changed the relative cost-utility of the screening methods in 2-way sensitivity analyses.

Conclusions:  Aortography gains additional quality life at minimal cost when used as a screening method for all patients with blunt chest trauma regardless of the results of the initial chest radiograph. With a normal initial chest radiograph, transesophageal echocardiography and dynamic chest computed tomography are associated with increased cost and loss of quality-adjusted life.(Arch Surg. 1996;131:619-626)

References
1.
Parmley LF, Mattingly TW, Manion WC, Jahnke EJ.  Nonpenetrating traumatic injury of the aorta . Circulation . 1958;17:1086-1101.Article
2.
Smith MD, Cassidy JM, Souther S, et al.  Transesophageal echocardiography in the diagnosis of traumatic rupture of the aorta . N Engl J Med . 1995;332:356-362.Article
3.
Saletta S, Lederman E, Fein S, Fortune JB.  Transesophageal echocardiography for the initial evaluation of the widened mediastinum in trauma patients . J Trauma . 1995;39:137-142.Article
4.
Brooks SW, Young JC, Cmolik B, et al.  The use of transesophageal echocardiography in the evaluation of chest trauma . J Trauma . 1992;32:761-768.Article
5.
Sparks MB, Burchard KW, Marrin CAS, et al.  Transesophageal echocardiography: preliminary results in patients with traumatic aortic rupture . Arch Surg . 1991;126:711-714.Article
6.
Nienaber CA, von Kodolitsch Y, Nicolas V, et al.  The diagnosis of thoracic aortic dissection by noninvasive imaging procedures . N Engl J Med . 1993;328:1-9.Article
7.
Durham RM, Zuckerman D, Wolverson M, et al.  Computed tomography as a screening exam in patients with suspected blunt aortic injury . Ann Surg . 1994; 220:699-704.Article
8.
Miller FB, Richardson JD, Thomas HA, et al.  Role of CT in diagnosis of major arterial injury after blunt thoracic trauma . Surgery . 1989;106:597-602.
9.
Tomiak MM, Rosenblum JD, Messersmith RN, Zarins CK.  Use of CT for diagnosis of traumatic rupture of the thoracic aorta . Ann Vasc Surg . 1993;7: 130-139.Article
10.
McLean TR, Olinger GN, Thorsen MK.  Computed tomography in the evaluation of the aorta in patients sustaining blunt chest trauma . J Trauma . 1991; 31:254-256.Article
11.
Raptopoulos V, Sheiman RG, Phillips DA, et al.  Traumatic aortic tear: screening with chest CT . Radiology . 1992;182:667-673.Article
12.
Drummond MF, Stoddart GK, Torrance GW. Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes . Oxford, England: Oxford University Press; 1987.
13.
Sox HC, Blatt MA, Higgins MC, Marton KI. Medical Decision Making . Boston, Mass: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1988.
14.
Pauker SG, Kassirer JP.  Decision analysis . N Engl J Med . 1987;316:250-258.Article
15.
Gundry SR, Burney RE, Mackenzie JR, et al.  Assessment of mediastinal widening associated with traumatic rupture of the aorta . J Trauma . 1983;23:293-299.Article
16.
Woodring JH.  The normal mediastinum in blunt traumatic rupture of the thoracic aorta and brachiocephalic arteries . J Emerg Med . 1990;8:467-476.Article
17.
Reid JDS, Weigelt JA, Thal ER, Francis H.  Assessment of proximity of a wound to major vascular structures as an indication for arteriography . Arch Surg . 1988; 123:942-946.Article
18.
Martin-Paredero V, Dixon SM, Baker JD, et al.  Risk of renal failure after major angiography . Arch Surg . 1983;118:1417-1420.Article
19.
McCollum CH, Garcia-Rinaldi R, Graham JM, et al.  Percutaneous needle arteriography . World J Surg . 1980;4:105-115.Article
20.
Hessel SJ, Adams DF, Abrams HL.  Complications of angiography . Radiology . 1981;138:273-281.Article
21.
Rittenhouse EA, Dillar DH, Winterscheid LC, Merendino KA.  Traumatic rupture of the thoracic aorta: a review of the literature and a report of five cases with attention to special problems in early surgical management . Ann Surg . 1969; 170:87-100.Article
22.
Cowley RA, Turney SZ, Hankin JR, et al.  Rupture of thoracic aorta caused by blunt trauma: a fifteen year experience . J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg . 1990;100: 652-661.
23.
Finkelmeier BA, Mentzer RM, Kaiser DL, et al.  Chronic traumatic thoracic aneurysm . J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg . 1982;84:257-266.
24.
Lundqvist C, Sisteen A, Blomstrand C, et al.  Spinal cord injuries: clinical, functional, and emotional status . Spine . 1991;16:78-83.Article
25.
Report on Medical School Faculty Salaries 1994-95 . Washington, DC: Association of American Medical Colleges; (February) 1995.
26.
Katz DA, Cronenwett JL.  The cost-effectiveness of early surgery versus watchful waiting in the management of small abdominal aortic aneurysms . J Vasc Surg . 1994;19:980-991.Article
27.
Feliciano PD, Mullins RJ, Trunkey DD, et al.  A decision analysis of traumatic splenic injuries . J Trauma . 1992;33:340-348.Article
28.
Molitch ME, Beck JR, Dreisman M, et al.  The cold thyroid nodule: an analysis of diagnostic and therapeutic options . Endocr Rev . 1984;5:185-199.Article
29.
Fahs MC, Mandelblatt J, Schechter C, Muller C.  Cost-effectiveness of cervical cancer screening for the elderly . Ann Intern Med . 1992;117:520-527.Article
30.
Oudkerk M, van Beek EJR, van Putten WLJ, Büller HR.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of various strategies in the diagnostic management of pulmonary embolism . Arch Intern Med . 1993;153:947-953.Article
31.
Etchason J, Petz L, Keeler E, et al.  The cost-effectiveness of preoperative autologous blood donations . N Engl J Med . 1995;332:719-724.Article
32.
 The periodic health examination: Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination . Can Med J . 1979;121:1193-1254.
33.
Finkler SA.  The distinction between cost and charges . Ann Intern Med . 1982; 96:102-109.Article
×