<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/">
  <channel>
    <title>AMA Publishing Group: Telemedicine Topic Collection</title>
    <link>http://pubs.jamanetwork.com/</link>
    <description>
    </description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2013 16:21:21 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>Silverchair</generator>
    <managingEditor>editor@pubs.jamanetwork.com</managingEditor>
    <webMaster>webmaster@pubs.jamanetwork.com</webMaster>
    <item>
      <title>Diagnostic Inaccuracy of Smartphone Applications for Melanoma Detection Melanoma Detection Using Smartphone Applications </title>
      <link>http://pubs.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleID=1557488</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Wolf JA, Moreau JF, Akilov O, et al. </author>
      <description>&lt;span class="paragraphSection"&gt;&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Objective&lt;/div&gt;To measure the performance of smartphone applications that evaluate photographs of skin lesions and provide the user with feedback about the likelihood of malignancy.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Design&lt;/div&gt;Case-control diagnostic accuracy study.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Setting&lt;/div&gt;Academic dermatology department.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Participants and Materials&lt;/div&gt;Digital clinical images of pigmented cutaneous lesions (60 melanoma and 128 benign control lesions) with a histologic diagnosis rendered by a board-certified dermatopathologist, obtained before biopsy from patients undergoing lesion removal as a part of routine care.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Main Outcome Measures&lt;/div&gt;Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of 4 smartphone applications designed to aid nonclinician users in determining whether their skin lesion is benign or malignant.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Results&lt;/div&gt;Sensitivity of the 4 tested applications ranged from 6.8% to 98.1%; specificity, 30.4% to 93.7%; positive predictive value, 33.3% to 42.1%; and negative predictive value, 65.4% to 97.0%. The highest sensitivity for melanoma diagnosis was observed for an application that sends the image directly to a board-certified dermatologist for analysis; the lowest, for applications that use automated algorithms to analyze images.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Conclusions&lt;/div&gt;The performance of smartphone applications in assessing melanoma risk is highly variable, and 3 of 4 smartphone applications incorrectly classified 30% or more of melanomas as unconcerning. Reliance on these applications, which are not subject to regulatory oversight, in lieu of medical consultation can delay the diagnosis of melanoma and harm users.&lt;/span&gt;</description>
      <prism:volume xmlns:prism="prism">149</prism:volume>
      <prism:number xmlns:prism="prism">4</prism:number>
      <prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="prism">422</prism:startingPage>
      <prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="prism">426</prism:endingPage>
      <prism:doi xmlns:prism="prism">10.1001/jamadermatol.2013.2382</prism:doi>
      <guid>http://pubs.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleID=1557488</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>