<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/">
  <channel>
    <title>AMA Publishing Group: Vascular Surgery Topic Collection</title>
    <link>http://pubs.jamanetwork.com/</link>
    <description>
    </description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 May 2013 16:50:13 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>Silverchair</generator>
    <managingEditor>editor@pubs.jamanetwork.com</managingEditor>
    <webMaster>webmaster@pubs.jamanetwork.com</webMaster>
    <item>
      <title>Effects of Salivary Bypass Tubes on Fistula and Stricture Formation Salivary Bypass Tubes </title>
      <link>http://pubs.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleID=1668311</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Punthakee X, Zaghi S, Nabili V, et al. </author>
      <description>&lt;span class="paragraphSection"&gt;&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Importance&lt;/div&gt;Stricture and fistula formation are two of the most common long-term complications of free flap reconstruction of hypopharyngeal defects.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Objective&lt;/div&gt;To examine the effects of salivary bypass tubes (SBTs) on fistula and stricture formation after free flap reconstruction of hypopharyngeal defects.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Design&lt;/div&gt;Retrospective cohort study.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Setting&lt;/div&gt;Academic tertiary care medical center.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Participants&lt;/div&gt;A total of 103 consecutive patients who underwent hypopharyngeal free flap reconstruction.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Intervention&lt;/div&gt;Use of salivary bypass tube.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Main Outcome Measure&lt;/div&gt;Fistula and stricture formation.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Results&lt;/div&gt;The overall fistula and stricture rates were 14.6% and 27.2%, respectively. Subgroup analysis revealed fistula rates of 7.4% in patients who received SBTs and 22.4% in those who did not (P = .048). However, no statistically significant difference between the two groups was shown with multivariate analysis. The unadjusted stricture rate was 30.6% without vs 24.1% with SBT placement (P = .51).&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Conclusions and Relevance&lt;/div&gt;Univariate analysis showed that SBT placement significantly reduced the risk of fistula in this population. Larger multicenter studies are needed to further explore the benefits of SBT use in preventing fistula and stricture formation.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Level of Evidence&lt;/div&gt;3.&lt;/span&gt;</description>
      <prism:volume xmlns:prism="prism">15</prism:volume>
      <prism:number xmlns:prism="prism">3</prism:number>
      <prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="prism">219</prism:startingPage>
      <prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="prism">225</prism:endingPage>
      <prism:doi xmlns:prism="prism">10.1001/jamafacial.2013.791</prism:doi>
      <guid>http://pubs.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleID=1668311</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>