[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 34.204.176.125. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
Curated health policy research and original commentary from across the JAMA Network
health-forum_ChannelsBanner
[Skip to Content Landing]
Insights

Will the 2020 Election Resolve the Question of Medicare for All?

  • 1Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
  • 2John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts

Political news coverage might lead one to believe that the 2020 election will settle the question of whether the country will move toward Medicare for All. This is, however, unlikely to be the case.

First, Medicare for All legislation is unlikely to be enacted in the follow-up to the 2020 election. Such an outcome would require the election of a Democratic president committed to Medicare for All, as well as a Democratic majority in the US House of Representatives and 60 or more Democratic senators, all of whom would have to be committed to supporting the legislation. Also, as of today, large numbers of Democrats in the House and Senate have not chosen to sign on to a Medicare for All bill. This is important because, given the political polarization in Congress, it is unlikely that any Republicans will vote for Medicare for All legislation. When the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) was passed in 2010, it did not receive a single Republican vote, in contrast to the 1965 enactment of Medicare, when nearly half the Republican members of Congress voted in favor.

Limit 200 characters
Limit 25 characters
Conflicts of Interest Disclosure

Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.

Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.

Err on the side of full disclosure.

If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.

Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.

Limit 140 characters
Limit 3600 characters or approximately 600 words
    ×