Mask Exemptions During the COVID-19 Pandemic—A New Frontier for Clinicians | Global Health | JAMA Health Forum | JAMA Network
[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 35.170.78.142. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
Curated health policy research and original commentary from across the JAMA Network
health-forum_ChannelsBanner
[Skip to Content Landing]
Insights
COVID-19

Mask Exemptions During the COVID-19 Pandemic—A New Frontier for Clinicians

  • 1College of Law, Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York
  • 2Department of History, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York
  • 3Department of Medicine, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York

Masking or face covering amid the global coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has emerged as a highly polarizing practice, with surprising partisan divisions. While masking remains contentious, there is bipartisan agreement among policy makers that medical exemptions for masking are necessary and appropriate. Yet there is a dearth of guidance for clinicians on how to approach a request for an exemption. We analyze the medical and legal standards to guide this debate.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has recommended face covering in public to avoid the spread of COVID-19. This recommendation applies broadly to all people older than 2 years, unless they have difficulty breathing or are incapacitated. States, municipalities, and businesses have set their own standards in masking requirements. There is, however, a dearth of evidence as to what conditions may warrant a medical exemption from this requirement. Within this gap, a new concern has emerged. A small but vocal group of people in the US have rejected calls for masking, with some claiming a medical exemption.

Limit 200 characters
Limit 25 characters
Conflicts of Interest Disclosure

Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.

Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.

Err on the side of full disclosure.

If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.

Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.

Limit 140 characters
Limit 3600 characters or approximately 600 words
    1 Comment for this article
    No Exemptions !
    Sanford Rosenthal, MD | None
    There is absolutely no reason for anyone to be given a mask exemption. I have severe obstructive asthma with areas of atelectasis, bronchiectasis, and remodeling of the airways and have no issues with wearing a mask. A good friend and fellow physician, who recently passed away, had end stage IPF and no problems wearing a mask.

    Don’t give mask exemptions to people who don’t want to wear a mask. They may give a reason that is euphonious, but it will be erroneous!
    CONFLICT OF INTEREST: None Reported
    ×