The study of language behavior offers a significant and fascinating approach to the study of mentation in psychotic conditions. In a simple and common sense way, this is recognized in every "mental status" recorded, but the possibilities of more penetrating study are not usually utilized fully, because of obvious difficulties. Curiosity is often blunted, also, by the naive assumption that one says what one means and means what one says, a supposition which leads the listener to believe that the meanings called to his mind by the patient's language are a precise transcript of the patient's meanings—certainly a precarious assumption in the ordinary transaction of asking for road directions, and likely to be an even more precarious guide to the psychotic patient's mentation. Considered simply as behavior, however, speech productions are impeccably objective. Indeed, for the study of behavior, speech has one striking advantage—it can be subdivided into specific and
WHITEHORN JC, ZIPF GK. SCHIZOPHRENIC LANGUAGE. Arch NeurPsych. 1943;49(6):831–851. doi:10.1001/archneurpsyc.1943.02290180055006
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.