[Skip to Navigation]
Other
November 1950

Studies in Lobotomy.

AMA Arch NeurPsych. 1950;64(5):752-753. doi:10.1001/archneurpsyc.1950.02310290148017

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

Many contributions on lobotomy have already come from the Boston Psychopathic Hospital; some of them are found to be reprinted or amplified in this volume, but many contributions that have not heretofore appeared in print are also presented. From a total of more than 500 cases, 205 of the earlier ones were selected for particularly careful evaluation on the basis of a long follow-up period of observation. The editors state: "As to the selection of patients most suited for lobotomy, elaborate studies correlated 83 different preoperative factors with eventual clinical outcome. Only a few factors have striking predictive value. A history of a rapid onset, absence of auditory hallucinations, and presence of insight greatly favored a good outcome after operation; the most favorable diagnostic label was either psychoneurosis or affective disorder.... Patients who possessed a syndrome including fear, worry, depression and tension ("tortured self-concern") were likely to be improved by

Add or change institution
×