JAMA Health Forum – Health Policy, Health Care Reform, Health Affairs | JAMA Health Forum | JAMA Network
[Skip to Navigation]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
JAMA Forum
April 15, 2021

Extreme Risk Protection Orders—A Tool for Clinicians to Prevent Gun Violence

Author Affiliations
  • 1Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
JAMA Health Forum. 2021;2(4):e210948. doi:10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.0948

Recent, widely publicized mass shootings in Atlanta, Georgia, Boulder, Colorado, Orange, California, and elsewhere have resurfaced questions about what can be done to prevent these terrible events. Nineteen states—as politically diverse as Florida and California—have laws on the books to temporarily prohibit gun purchase and possession by people who are behaving dangerously and at risk of committing violence, including self-harm. However, early evidence indicates that few clinicians are aware of how to use this emerging legal tool to prevent violence.

Here are the basics. In each state that has authorized what are called extreme risk protection orders (ERPOs), the law sets out who can file a petition with a civil court about someone of concern. Eligible petitioners always include law enforcement officers; in most states, family members are eligible, and in Hawaii, Maryland, and Washington, DC, clinicians are on the list. The petitions specify the reasons for concern, such as threatening violence, illegally and recklessly brandishing a gun, or articulating a suicide plan. A judge then reviews the request and decides whether to issue an ERPO. In most cases, the petitions are granted, leading to temporary removal of firearms for up to 1 year. After the order has expired, the people on whom restrictions are levied are able to regain possession of their guns and buy new guns. The ImplementERPO website includes detailed information about state ERPO laws.

Limit 200 characters
Limit 25 characters
Conflicts of Interest Disclosure

Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.

Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.

Err on the side of full disclosure.

If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.

Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.

Limit 140 characters
Limit 3600 characters or approximately 600 words