Counseling patients on health risks and behaviors is a core competency for all clinicians. Patients are frequently presented with questionnaires assessing their use of seatbelts or the presence of stairs in their homes to help facilitate these discussions—encouraging patients to use appropriate safety seats for children or preventing falls for older adults. The same should be true for firearm safety, given that according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, about 40 000 people die each year from firearm injuries, most of which are suicides.1 However, studies consistently show that physicians rarely ask about any aspect of firearm safety in health maintenance visits. Indeed, only about 20% of pediatricians ask more than 5% of their patients about gun ownership.2
In their Original Investigation in this issue of JAMA Health Forum, Dr Richards and colleagues3 present a cross-sectional study evaluating patients’ self-reporting of firearm access on a questionnaire administered in a primary care or outpatient mental health setting. They found that most patients responded to the question in this format: more than 80% responded in a primary care setting, and more than 90% responded in a mental health care setting.
Physicians are legally allowed to counsel patients on gun safety in all states. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act prohibits required collection of information related to firearms but does not restrict firearm-related counseling between clinicians and patients,4 and after the Florida Firearm Owners’ Privacy Act was overturned as a violation of physicians’ First Amendment rights, no state statute regulates clinician-patient discussions on firearms.5,6
Asking this basic question is an important means by which clinicians can begin to understand firearm ownership among their patients. When clinicians were surveyed on what aspects of firearm safety education were most needed and would be most useful, they often requested specific language to use when talking to families.7 While we need a validated framework for how clinicians can approach these sensitive conversations, posing questions in a printed format is clearly an acceptable option. A simple questionnaire is an easy, efficient, and effective means of gathering important patient information. Especially for clinicians who may feel less confident asking these questions, this allows them to pose questions in a way that is respectful and nonjudgmental.
Inquiring about firearm access on a questionnaire opens the door to a potentially lifesaving discussion of firearm safety, but clinicians must step through it. Dr Richards and colleagues3 found that about 20% of patients in a primary care setting and 15% of patients in a mental health care setting reported having access to a firearm. If we screen, we must also be prepared to intervene. A questionnaire identifying gun-owning patients must be followed by tailored, risk-based counseling. Unfortunately, clinicians are currently ill equipped to provide this counseling, with only about 20% of pediatric residents in 1 survey reporting that they had ever received any didactic education on firearm injury.7
As a clinic prepares to include a question about firearm access in its standard health monitoring questionnaire, consideration must be given to equipping clinicians with the tools they need to respond to positive screens. What are the relevant policies in that state, especially those related to safe storage or protection of individuals at imminent risk of harm to self or others? What other risk factors are present? For example, are there young children in the home with an unsafely stored firearm, or is the patient a victim of intimate partner violence, or has this patient recently been hospitalized for depression? Efforts are underway to design curricula and educational programming for clinicians to help meet this critical educational need.
Asking a question about access to firearms can be the first step to saving a life. Coupling a feasible and effective screening strategy, such as that proposed by Dr Richards and colleagues,3 with a rigorous and evidence-based educational program will help clinicians cross the threshold to becoming competent and confident counselors.
Published: August 6, 2021. doi:10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.1586
Open Access: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License. © 2021 Hoops KEM. JAMA Health Forum.
Corresponding Author: Katherine E. M. Hoops, MD, MPH, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Charlotte R. Bloomberg Children’s Center, 1800 Orleans St, Ste 6349J, Baltimore, MD 21287 (email@example.com).
Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.
Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.
Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.
Err on the side of full disclosure.
If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.
Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.
Hoops KEM. Opening the Door to a Discussion on Gun Safety. JAMA Health Forum. 2021;2(8):e211586. doi:10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.1586