Margaret A.WinkerMD, Deputy EditorIndividualAuthorPhil B.FontanarosaMD, Interim CoeditorIndividualAuthor
To the Editor: The meta-analysis of total parenteral
nutrition (TPN) in the critically ill patient by Dr Heyland and colleagues1 illustrates several of the serious problems of
meta-analysis compared with randomized clinical trials. These involve heterogeneity
of the trials included, failure of the investigators performing the meta-analysis
to understand the basic issues, and defects in abstracting.2
Several problems illustrate why there should be a reluctance to base clinical
decisions about the use of TPN on the distilled findings from this meta-analysis.
Khaodhiar L, Bistrian BR. Total Parenteral Nutrition for Critically Ill Patients. JAMA. 1999;282(15):1423–1425. doi:10-1001/pubs.JAMA-ISSN-0098-7484-282-15-jac90009
Coronavirus Resource Center
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: