Copyright 2001 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved. Applicable FARS/DFARS Restrictions Apply to Government Use.2001
To the Editor: Dr Botkin discussed whether the privacy of family members should be protected in research.1 We disagree with his proposal that family history information about psychiatric disorders should be subjected to unique restrictions. He argues that cancer, diabetes, and arthritis are "no longer considered highly sensitive conditions," but that "conditions with a behavioral or psychiatric component, such as alcoholism or schizophrenia, remain stigmatizing." He suggests that for psychiatric disorders alone, identifiable relatives must give consent before a subject reports on family history because the slight possibility of breaching the index subject's confidentiality represents more than a minimal risk to the relative.
Levinson DF, Reich T, Todd RD, et al. Protecting the Privacy of Family Members in Research. JAMA. 2001;285(15):1960–1963. doi:10.1001/jama.285.15.1960
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.