[Skip to Content]
[Skip to Content Landing]
August 24/31, 2011

Equality-in-Quality in the Era of the Affordable Care Act

Author Affiliations

Author Affiliations: Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Clinical Scholars Program and Child Health Evaluation and Research (CHEAR) Unit, Division of General Pediatrics (Drs Davis and Walter) and Division of General Medicine and Gerald R. Ford School of Public Policy (Dr Davis); University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.

JAMA. 2011;306(8):872-873. doi:10.1001/jama.2011.1208

Health care received by patients in the United States is of inadequate quality.1 As part of the federal response to this major shortcoming, ensuring high-quality health care is a central theme throughout the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) signed into law in 2010.

The focus on improving quality in the ACA, however, effectively overshadows other major concerns about the US health care system—among them, pervasive and persistent disparities in health care related to factors such as sex, race/ethnicity, social class, insurance status, and language that fundamentally constrain how much overall quality can improve. The comparative inattention in the ACA to known inequalities in health care is noteworthy, not only in comparison with the focus on quality, but also because the lack of emphasis on disparities in the ACA language is inconsistent with recent positions of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)2 and the Institute of Medicine (IOM).3 The AHRQ and IOM have indicated that reducing disparities is an unambiguous priority in working to improve quality in health care.1-3 This approach is consistent with analyses suggesting that reducing disparities based on social factors may improve health care quality more than would marginal improvements in overall medical care.4