Margaret A.WinkerMD, Senior EditorIndividualAuthorPhil B.FontanarosaMD, Senior EditorIndividualAuthor
In Reply.—Drs Connolly and Harris1 criticize us for describing the Massachusetts antitobacco media campaign as "a more youth-oriented approach" than the one California used. Yet, they use the fact that the Massachusetts campaign was more youth oriented to explain why we saw faster declines in per capita consumption of cigarettes in California than in Massachusetts. They are correct in stating that youth consume only 2% to 3% of cigarettes, which is another reason that a youth-focused program is a mistake. It is, after all, the adults whom tobacco kills. Moreover, while it is preferable to prevent tobacco use altogether, to stop smoking in young adulthood avoids the long-term health consequences.2,3
Goldman LK, Glantz SA. Evaluating Antismoking Advertising Campaigns—Reply. JAMA. 1998;280(11):964–965. doi:10-1001/pubs.JAMA-ISSN-0098-7484-280-11-jbk0916
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: