This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.
To the Editor:
—Recently accumulating data that cast serious doubt on the association of adenomatous polyps and the development of rectal carcinoma should not be misinterpreted as negating the importance of sigmoidoscopy. It would be useful to have some characteristic to identify the cancer-prone patients who require more careful observations. Adenomatous polyps apparently do not fulfill this role. Thus, patients without polyps should have the same periodic re-examinations that previously were suggested for polyp-bearers, until better indices of increased cancer risk are defined.There does not appear to be any substantive difference of opinion between Dr. Roberts' comment and the editorial.
Shimkin MB. Rectal Polyps and Cancer. JAMA. 1963;183(13):1116. doi:10.1001/jama.1963.03700130084021
* * SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE * *
The JAMA Network Sites will be conducting routine maintenance from 10/20/2017 through 10/21/2017. During this window access to content and authentication may be intermittently available. The JAMA Store will be completely unavailable during the maintenance window.