This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.
To the Editor:—
Mistakes in blood grouping are an unlikely explanation for the excess of MN individuals in either the control or the patient groups. All of the typings were performed at random by 1 technician, using commercial, high titer, standardized, specific, rabbit antisera. The cells are promptly agglutinated by the proper antisera, which is readily noted on inspection of the tube containing the cells and antisera. Some of the more plausible explanations for the unexpected high MN frequencies observed in this study have been suggested by Morton and Chung (Amer J Hum Genet11:237-251 [Sept.] 1959). If Dr. Wiener's contention is granted, since groupings were done at random both for controls and patients, no explanation is provided for the discrepancies between the controls and the rheumatic fever patients, and the agreement in the MN frequencies of the controls with those of duodenal and gastric ulcer, gastric carcinoma, and
Buckwalter JA. The Rhesus and MN Blood Groups and Disease-Reply. JAMA. 1962;180(11):988. doi:10.1001/jama.1962.03050240084025
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: