Letters Section Editor: Jody W. Zylke, MD, Senior Editor.
Author Affiliations: Department of Radiation Oncology, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Piscataway, New Jersey (Dr Khan; email@example.com); Michigan Healthcare Professionals, 21st Century Oncology, Farmington Hills (Dr Vicini); and Virginia Commonwealth University, Massey Cancer Center, Richmond (Dr Arthur).
To the Editor: Dr Smith and colleagues1 compared outcomes of whole breast irradiation (WBI) vs brachytherapy in older women with breast cancer. We are concerned that the findings from this claims-based study may result in unnecessary anxiety for women treated with brachytherapy. Claims-based studies using large databases are subject to the limitations of retrospective analyses and can be especially problematic if data on important and validated determinants of treatment success are not available. We are unsure if subsequent mastectomy is a valid surrogate for breast conservation as indicated by the authors. Laterality of breast surgery is typically not reported in Medicare claims. Thus a patient having a contralateral mastectomy for any reason would be scored as a treatment failure in the study. Also, we believe the 5-year difference in subsequent mastectomy rates after brachytherapy of 1.77% reported in the study should not be interpreted as inferior to WBI; a difference of this magnitude is of questionable clinical relevance.2
Khan AJ, Vicini FA, Arthur D. Brachytherapy vs Whole-Breast Irradiation for Breast Cancer. JAMA. 2012;308(6):567–568. doi:10.1001/jama.2012.8486
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: