JAMA 100 Years Ago Section Editor: Jennifer Reiling, Assistant Editor.
To the Editor:— Please inform me why the physicians attending Colonel Roosevelt thought it advisable to leave the bullet undisturbed. In my opinion, since the bullet is a foreign body, which may travel and cause destructive changes, and since in this instance the bullet is so superficially located that it is easily accessible, I think that it would have been best to remove it.
M. A. BERNSTEIN, M.D., Kenosha, Wis.
SHOULD A BULLET BE REMOVED? JAMA. 2012;308(7):652. doi:10.1001/jama.2012.8959
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: