A central dilemma in public health is reconciling the role of the individual with the role of the government in promoting health. On the one hand, governmental policy approaches—taxes, bans, and other regulations—are seen as emblematic of “nanny state” overreach. In this view, public health regulation is part of a slippery slope toward escalating government intrusion on individual liberty. On the other hand, regulatory policy is described as a fundamental instrument for a “savvy state” to combat the conditions underlying an inexorable epidemic of chronic diseases. Proponents of public health regulation cite the association of aggressive tobacco control, physical activity, and nutritional interventions with demonstrable increases in life expectancy.1
Chokshi DA, Stine NW. Reconsidering the Politics of Public Health. JAMA. 2013;310(10):1025–1026. doi:10.1001/jama.2013.110872
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: