To the Editor: During the course of the ALLHAT
study,1 about 10% of all patients developed
new diabetes, defined as a fasting blood sugar greater than 126 mg/dL. Interestingly,
the risk among patients on chlorthalidone was between 43% to 65% higher vs
those on lisinopril and between 18% to 30% higher vs those on amlodipine.
These findings corroborate previous findings of a moderate risk of diabetes
with thiazide diuretics2,3 and
of an equally moderate protective effect of drugs that block the renin-angiotensin
system.4,5 However, the
ALLHAT authors state, "Overall these metabolic differences did not translate
into more cardiovascular events or into higher all-cause mortality in the
chlorthalidone group compared with the other 2 groups." Although it may seem
reassuring that none of the complications of diabetes was observed in ALLHAT,
it must be remembered that antihypertensive therapy is lifelong, and that,
therefore, a period of 2 to 6 years, such as in ALLHAT, is unlikely to estimate
the long-term sequelae of the high risk of diabetes associated with chlorthalidone.
Given that diabetes has reached epidemic proportions in industrialized countries,
any factor that is known to accelerate this risk should be avoided, unless
the benefits clearly outweigh the risks. Since in ALLHAT there was no difference
in primary outcome nor in mortality between the 3 treatment arms, we suggest
that thiazide diuretics should be avoided or at least not used as monotherapy
for patients with hypertension at risk for diabetes.
Long-term Cardiovascular Consequences of Diuretics vs Calcium Channel
Blockers vs Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors. JAMA. 2003;289(16):2066. doi:10.1001/jama.289.16.2067
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: