[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
November 6, 2013

The Peer Review Congresses: Improving Peer Review and Biomedical Publication

Author Affiliations
  • 1Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
JAMA. 2013;310(17):1799-1800. doi:10.1001/jama.2013.280834

Original scientific reports in peer-reviewed journals are the cornerstones of new medical knowledge. Yet medical journalism, unlike research, is not a science but rather, like medical practice, a mix of art and science. All journals face the continuing challenges of providing their readers with information they can trust, improving their systems for evaluating manuscripts, and dealing with increasing concerns about financial and intellectual conflicts of interest. Diagnosing the ills of biomedical publications and advancing solutions are the missions of the International Congresses on Peer Review and Biomedical Publication, the seventh and most recent of which was held in Chicago in September 2013, organized by The JAMA Network and the BMJ and once again led by Drummond Rennie, MD.