[Skip to Content]
[Skip to Content Landing]
Views 625
Citations 0
Comment & Response
May 7, 2014

Discharges Against Medical Advice—Reply

Author Affiliations
  • 1VA National Center for Ethics in Health Care, NYU School of Medicine, New York, New York
  • 2Department of Internal Medicine, University of Oklahoma School of Community Medicine, Tulsa

Copyright 2014 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved. Applicable FARS/DFARS Restrictions Apply to Government Use.

JAMA. 2014;311(17):1808-1809. doi:10.1001/jama.2014.1481

In Reply Dr Querques and colleagues advance the dialogue on this important topic. We disagree, however, with their characterization of SDM and wish to clarify how it might apply to discharges against medical advice.

Querques and colleagues contend that the against medical advice designation can be a sign of professionalism and an articulation of the physician’s values that a patient’s health is important. We are troubled by their description of a clinical scenario that squares a physician’s values against a patient’s because we believe that it is inconsistent with the intent of SDM. Procedurally distinct from a decision-making capacity assessment, SDM seeks to elicit a patient’s values and preferences for care to decide about an appropriate treatment in light of the risks, benefits, and alternatives as described by the physician.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview